From: piaojun <piaojun@huawei.com>
To: ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
Subject: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH v3] ocfs2: clean up redundant function declarations
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 08:39:35 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5AE11FC7.5000903@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <09cf7125-6f12-e53e-20f5-e606b2c16b48@huawei.com>
LGTM
On 2018/4/25 19:21, Jia Guo wrote:
> The function ocfs2_extend_allocation has been deleted, clean up its
> declaration. Also change the static function name from
> __ocfs2_extend_allocation() to ocfs2_extend_allocation() to be
> consistent with the corresponding trace events as well as comments
> for ocfs2_lock_allocators().
>
> Fixes: 964f14a0d350 ("ocfs2: clean up some dead code")
>
> Signed-off-by: Jia Guo <guojia12@huawei.com>
> Acked-by: Joseph Qi <jiangqi903@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jun Piao <piaojun@huawei.com>
> ---
> fs/ocfs2/file.c | 10 +++++-----
> fs/ocfs2/file.h | 2 --
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/file.c b/fs/ocfs2/file.c
> index 6ee94bc..a2a8603 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/file.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/file.c
> @@ -563,8 +563,8 @@ int ocfs2_add_inode_data(struct ocfs2_super *osb,
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static int __ocfs2_extend_allocation(struct inode *inode, u32 logical_start,
> - u32 clusters_to_add, int mark_unwritten)
> +static int ocfs2_extend_allocation(struct inode *inode, u32 logical_start,
> + u32 clusters_to_add, int mark_unwritten)
> {
> int status = 0;
> int restart_func = 0;
> @@ -1035,8 +1035,8 @@ int ocfs2_extend_no_holes(struct inode *inode, struct buffer_head *di_bh,
> clusters_to_add -= oi->ip_clusters;
>
> if (clusters_to_add) {
> - ret = __ocfs2_extend_allocation(inode, oi->ip_clusters,
> - clusters_to_add, 0);
> + ret = ocfs2_extend_allocation(inode, oi->ip_clusters,
> + clusters_to_add, 0);
> if (ret) {
> mlog_errno(ret);
> goto out;
> @@ -1493,7 +1493,7 @@ static int ocfs2_allocate_unwritten_extents(struct inode *inode,
> goto next;
> }
>
> - ret = __ocfs2_extend_allocation(inode, cpos, alloc_size, 1);
> + ret = ocfs2_extend_allocation(inode, cpos, alloc_size, 1);
> if (ret) {
> if (ret != -ENOSPC)
> mlog_errno(ret);
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/file.h b/fs/ocfs2/file.h
> index 1fdc983..7eb7f03 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/file.h
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/file.h
> @@ -65,8 +65,6 @@ int ocfs2_extend_no_holes(struct inode *inode, struct buffer_head *di_bh,
> u64 new_i_size, u64 zero_to);
> int ocfs2_zero_extend(struct inode *inode, struct buffer_head *di_bh,
> loff_t zero_to);
> -int ocfs2_extend_allocation(struct inode *inode, u32 logical_start,
> - u32 clusters_to_add, int mark_unwritten);
> int ocfs2_setattr(struct dentry *dentry, struct iattr *attr);
> int ocfs2_getattr(const struct path *path, struct kstat *stat,
> u32 request_mask, unsigned int flags);
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-26 0:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-25 11:21 [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH v3] ocfs2: clean up redundant function declarations Jia Guo
2018-04-26 0:39 ` piaojun [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5AE11FC7.5000903@huawei.com \
--to=piaojun@huawei.com \
--cc=ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.