From: yangyingliang@huawei.com (Yang Yingliang)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] irqchip/gic-v3-its: fix ITS queue timeout
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2018 09:43:03 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5B173C27.30401@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <834fde1b-5ae0-afc6-283f-2a470757e54a@arm.com>
Hi, Julien
On 2018/6/5 18:16, Julien Thierry wrote:
> Hi Yang,
>
> On 05/06/18 07:30, Yang Yingliang wrote:
>> When the kernel booted with maxcpus=x, 'x' is smaller
>> than actual cpu numbers, the TAs of offline cpus won't
>> be set to its->collection.
>>
>> If LPI is bind to offline cpu, sync cmd will use zero TA,
>> it leads to ITS queue timeout. Fix this by choosing a
>> online cpu, if there is no online cpu in cpu_mask.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c | 9 +++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
>> b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
>> index 5416f2b..edd92a9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
>> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
>> @@ -2309,7 +2309,9 @@ static int its_irq_domain_activate(struct
>> irq_domain *domain,
>> cpu_mask = cpumask_of_node(its_dev->its->numa_node);
>> /* Bind the LPI to the first possible CPU */
>> - cpu = cpumask_first(cpu_mask);
>> + cpu = cpumask_first_and(cpu_mask, cpu_online_mask);
>> + if (!cpu_online(cpu))
>
> Testing for cpu being online here feels a bit redundant.
>
> Since cpu is online if the cpumask_first_and returns a valid cpu, I
> think you could replace this test with:
>
> if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
Yes, I used wrong check here, according to comment of cpumask_first_and,
this func will returns >= nr_cpu_ids if no cpus set in both.
I'll send v2 later.
>
>> + cpu = cpumask_first(cpu_online_mask);
>> its_dev->event_map.col_map[event] = cpu;
>> irq_data_update_effective_affinity(d, cpumask_of(cpu));
>> @@ -2466,7 +2468,10 @@ static int its_vpe_set_affinity(struct
>> irq_data *d,
>> bool force)
>> {
>> struct its_vpe *vpe = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
>> - int cpu = cpumask_first(mask_val);
>> + int cpu = cpumask_first_and(mask_val, cpu_online_mask);
>> +
>> + if (!cpu_online(cpu))
>
> Same thing here.
>
>> + cpu = cpumask_first(cpu_online_mask);
>> /*
>> * Changing affinity is mega expensive, so let's be as lazy as
>>
>
> Cheers,
>
Thanks,
Yang
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
To: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>, <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] irqchip/gic-v3-its: fix ITS queue timeout
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2018 09:43:03 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5B173C27.30401@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <834fde1b-5ae0-afc6-283f-2a470757e54a@arm.com>
Hi, Julien
On 2018/6/5 18:16, Julien Thierry wrote:
> Hi Yang,
>
> On 05/06/18 07:30, Yang Yingliang wrote:
>> When the kernel booted with maxcpus=x, 'x' is smaller
>> than actual cpu numbers, the TAs of offline cpus won't
>> be set to its->collection.
>>
>> If LPI is bind to offline cpu, sync cmd will use zero TA,
>> it leads to ITS queue timeout. Fix this by choosing a
>> online cpu, if there is no online cpu in cpu_mask.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c | 9 +++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
>> b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
>> index 5416f2b..edd92a9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
>> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
>> @@ -2309,7 +2309,9 @@ static int its_irq_domain_activate(struct
>> irq_domain *domain,
>> cpu_mask = cpumask_of_node(its_dev->its->numa_node);
>> /* Bind the LPI to the first possible CPU */
>> - cpu = cpumask_first(cpu_mask);
>> + cpu = cpumask_first_and(cpu_mask, cpu_online_mask);
>> + if (!cpu_online(cpu))
>
> Testing for cpu being online here feels a bit redundant.
>
> Since cpu is online if the cpumask_first_and returns a valid cpu, I
> think you could replace this test with:
>
> if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
Yes, I used wrong check here, according to comment of cpumask_first_and,
this func will returns >= nr_cpu_ids if no cpus set in both.
I'll send v2 later.
>
>> + cpu = cpumask_first(cpu_online_mask);
>> its_dev->event_map.col_map[event] = cpu;
>> irq_data_update_effective_affinity(d, cpumask_of(cpu));
>> @@ -2466,7 +2468,10 @@ static int its_vpe_set_affinity(struct
>> irq_data *d,
>> bool force)
>> {
>> struct its_vpe *vpe = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
>> - int cpu = cpumask_first(mask_val);
>> + int cpu = cpumask_first_and(mask_val, cpu_online_mask);
>> +
>> + if (!cpu_online(cpu))
>
> Same thing here.
>
>> + cpu = cpumask_first(cpu_online_mask);
>> /*
>> * Changing affinity is mega expensive, so let's be as lazy as
>>
>
> Cheers,
>
Thanks,
Yang
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-06 1:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-05 6:30 [PATCH] irqchip/gic-v3-its: fix ITS queue timeout Yang Yingliang
2018-06-05 6:30 ` Yang Yingliang
2018-06-05 10:16 ` Julien Thierry
2018-06-05 10:16 ` Julien Thierry
2018-06-06 1:43 ` Yang Yingliang [this message]
2018-06-06 1:43 ` Yang Yingliang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5B173C27.30401@huawei.com \
--to=yangyingliang@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.