From: piaojun <piaojun@huawei.com>
To: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org>
Cc: Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@gmail.com>,
Ron Minnich <rminnich@sandia.gov>,
Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@ionkov.net>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: [PATCH v2] net/9p/client.c: fix misuse of spin_lock_irqsave for p9_client lock
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2018 14:25:28 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5B4D8BD8.3040009@huawei.com> (raw)
In p9_read_work(), we use spin_lock for client->lock, but misuse
spin_lock_irqsave for it in p9_fid_create(). As p9_client lock won't be
locked in irq context, so spin_lock is enough. And that will improve the
performance.
Rebased on 9p-next.
Signed-off-by: Jun Piao <piaojun@huawei.com>
---
net/9p/client.c | 18 ++++++++----------
net/9p/trans_fd.c | 7 +++----
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/9p/client.c b/net/9p/client.c
index 30f9aee..f6897ee 100644
--- a/net/9p/client.c
+++ b/net/9p/client.c
@@ -275,14 +275,14 @@ static struct p9_fcall *p9_fcall_alloc(int alloc_msize)
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&req->req_list);
idr_preload(GFP_NOFS);
- spin_lock_irq(&c->lock);
+ spin_lock(&c->lock);
if (type == P9_TVERSION)
tag = idr_alloc(&c->reqs, req, P9_NOTAG, P9_NOTAG + 1,
GFP_NOWAIT);
else
tag = idr_alloc(&c->reqs, req, 0, P9_NOTAG, GFP_NOWAIT);
req->tc->tag = tag;
- spin_unlock_irq(&c->lock);
+ spin_unlock(&c->lock);
idr_preload_end();
if (tag < 0)
goto free;
@@ -328,13 +328,12 @@ struct p9_req_t *p9_tag_lookup(struct p9_client *c, u16 tag)
*/
static void p9_free_req(struct p9_client *c, struct p9_req_t *r)
{
- unsigned long flags;
u16 tag = r->tc->tag;
p9_debug(P9_DEBUG_MUX, "clnt %p req %p tag: %d\n", c, r, tag);
- spin_lock_irqsave(&c->lock, flags);
+ spin_lock(&c->lock);
idr_remove(&c->reqs, tag);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&c->lock, flags);
+ spin_unlock(&c->lock);
kfree(r->tc);
kfree(r->rc);
kmem_cache_free(p9_req_cache, r);
@@ -846,10 +845,10 @@ static struct p9_fid *p9_fid_create(struct p9_client *clnt)
fid->fid = 0;
idr_preload(GFP_KERNEL);
- spin_lock_irq(&clnt->lock);
+ spin_lock(&clnt->lock);
ret = idr_alloc_u32(&clnt->fids, fid, &fid->fid, P9_NOFID - 1,
GFP_NOWAIT);
- spin_unlock_irq(&clnt->lock);
+ spin_unlock(&clnt->lock);
idr_preload_end();
if (!ret)
@@ -862,13 +861,12 @@ static struct p9_fid *p9_fid_create(struct p9_client *clnt)
static void p9_fid_destroy(struct p9_fid *fid)
{
struct p9_client *clnt;
- unsigned long flags;
p9_debug(P9_DEBUG_FID, "fid %d\n", fid->fid);
clnt = fid->clnt;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&clnt->lock, flags);
+ spin_lock(&clnt->lock);
idr_remove(&clnt->fids, fid->fid);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&clnt->lock, flags);
+ spin_unlock(&clnt->lock);
kfree(fid->rdir);
kfree(fid);
}
diff --git a/net/9p/trans_fd.c b/net/9p/trans_fd.c
index bf459ee..94ef685 100644
--- a/net/9p/trans_fd.c
+++ b/net/9p/trans_fd.c
@@ -197,15 +197,14 @@ static void p9_mux_poll_stop(struct p9_conn *m)
static void p9_conn_cancel(struct p9_conn *m, int err)
{
struct p9_req_t *req, *rtmp;
- unsigned long flags;
LIST_HEAD(cancel_list);
p9_debug(P9_DEBUG_ERROR, "mux %p err %d\n", m, err);
- spin_lock_irqsave(&m->client->lock, flags);
+ spin_lock(&m->client->lock);
if (m->err) {
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&m->client->lock, flags);
+ spin_unlock(&m->client->lock);
return;
}
@@ -217,7 +216,7 @@ static void p9_conn_cancel(struct p9_conn *m, int err)
list_for_each_entry_safe(req, rtmp, &m->unsent_req_list, req_list) {
list_move(&req->req_list, &cancel_list);
}
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&m->client->lock, flags);
+ spin_unlock(&m->client->lock);
list_for_each_entry_safe(req, rtmp, &cancel_list, req_list) {
p9_debug(P9_DEBUG_ERROR, "call back req %p\n", req);
--
next reply other threads:[~2018-07-17 6:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-17 6:25 piaojun [this message]
2018-07-17 11:56 ` [PATCH v2] net/9p/client.c: fix misuse of spin_lock_irqsave for p9_client lock Dominique Martinet
2018-07-18 2:19 ` piaojun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5B4D8BD8.3040009@huawei.com \
--to=piaojun@huawei.com \
--cc=asmadeus@codewreck.org \
--cc=ericvh@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lucho@ionkov.net \
--cc=rminnich@sandia.gov \
--cc=v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.