From: Mike Christie <mchristi@redhat.com>
To: target-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] target/iblock: split T10 PI SGL across command bios
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2018 21:07:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5B7C7EFC.5090400@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180808193140.1463-1-gedwards@ddn.com>
On 08/08/2018 02:31 PM, Greg Edwards wrote:
> When T10 PI is enabled on a backing device for the iblock backstore, the
> PI SGL for the entire command is attached to the first bio only. This
> works fine if the command is covered by a single bio, but results in
> integrity verification errors for the other bios in a multi-bio command.
>
Did you hit this with a older distro kernel?
It looks like iblock_get_bio will alloc a bio that has enough vecs for
the entire cmd (bi_max_vecs will equal sgl_nents). So it is not clear to
me how does the bio_add_page call ever return a value other than
sg->length, and we end up doing another iblock_get_bio call?
> Split the PI SGL across the bios in the command, so each bip contains
> the protection information for the data in the bio. In a multi-bio
> command, store where we left off in the PI SGL so we know where to start
> with the next bio.
>
> Signed-off-by: Greg Edwards <gedwards@ddn.com>
> ---
> This patch depends on commit 359f642700f2 ("block: move
> bio_integrity_{intervals,bytes} into blkdev.h") in Jens' block for-next branch.
>
> drivers/target/target_core_iblock.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_iblock.c b/drivers/target/target_core_iblock.c
> index ce1321a5cb7b..d3ab83282f61 100644
> --- a/drivers/target/target_core_iblock.c
> +++ b/drivers/target/target_core_iblock.c
> @@ -635,7 +635,8 @@ static ssize_t iblock_show_configfs_dev_params(struct se_device *dev, char *b)
> }
>
> static int
> -iblock_alloc_bip(struct se_cmd *cmd, struct bio *bio)
> +iblock_alloc_bip(struct se_cmd *cmd, struct bio *bio,
> + struct scatterlist **sgl, unsigned int *skip)
> {
> struct se_device *dev = cmd->se_dev;
> struct blk_integrity *bi;
> @@ -643,6 +644,7 @@ iblock_alloc_bip(struct se_cmd *cmd, struct bio *bio)
> struct iblock_dev *ib_dev = IBLOCK_DEV(dev);
> struct scatterlist *sg;
> int i, rc;
> + unsigned int size, nr_pages, len, off;
>
> bi = bdev_get_integrity(ib_dev->ibd_bd);
> if (!bi) {
> @@ -650,32 +652,52 @@ iblock_alloc_bip(struct se_cmd *cmd, struct bio *bio)
> return -ENODEV;
> }
>
> - bip = bio_integrity_alloc(bio, GFP_NOIO, cmd->t_prot_nents);
> + nr_pages = min_t(unsigned int, cmd->t_prot_nents, BIO_MAX_PAGES);
> + bip = bio_integrity_alloc(bio, GFP_NOIO, nr_pages);
> if (IS_ERR(bip)) {
> pr_err("Unable to allocate bio_integrity_payload\n");
> return PTR_ERR(bip);
> }
>
> - bip->bip_iter.bi_size = (cmd->data_length / dev->dev_attrib.block_size) *
> - dev->prot_length;
> - bip->bip_iter.bi_sector = bio->bi_iter.bi_sector;
> + bip->bip_iter.bi_size = bio_integrity_bytes(bi, bio_sectors(bio));
> + bip_set_seed(bip, bio->bi_iter.bi_sector);
>
> pr_debug("IBLOCK BIP Size: %u Sector: %llu\n", bip->bip_iter.bi_size,
> (unsigned long long)bip->bip_iter.bi_sector);
>
> - for_each_sg(cmd->t_prot_sg, sg, cmd->t_prot_nents, i) {
> + size = bip->bip_iter.bi_size;
> + for_each_sg(*sgl, sg, nr_pages, i) {
>
> - rc = bio_integrity_add_page(bio, sg_page(sg), sg->length,
> - sg->offset);
> - if (rc != sg->length) {
> + len = sg->length - *skip;
> + off = sg->offset + *skip;
> +
> + if (*skip)
> + *skip = 0;
> +
> + if (len > size) {
> + len = size;
> + *skip = len;
> + }
> +
> + rc = bio_integrity_add_page(bio, sg_page(sg), len, off);
> + if (rc != len) {
> pr_err("bio_integrity_add_page() failed; %d\n", rc);
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
>
> pr_debug("Added bio integrity page: %p length: %d offset; %d\n",
> - sg_page(sg), sg->length, sg->offset);
> + sg_page(sg), len, off);
> +
> + size -= len;
> + if (!size)
> + break;
> }
>
> + if (*skip = 0)
> + *sgl = sg_next(sg);
> + else
> + *sgl = sg;
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -686,12 +708,12 @@ iblock_execute_rw(struct se_cmd *cmd, struct scatterlist *sgl, u32 sgl_nents,
> struct se_device *dev = cmd->se_dev;
> sector_t block_lba = target_to_linux_sector(dev, cmd->t_task_lba);
> struct iblock_req *ibr;
> - struct bio *bio, *bio_start;
> + struct bio *bio;
> struct bio_list list;
> - struct scatterlist *sg;
> + struct scatterlist *sg, *sg_prot = cmd->t_prot_sg;
> u32 sg_num = sgl_nents;
> - unsigned bio_cnt;
> - int i, op, op_flags = 0;
> + unsigned int bio_cnt, skip = 0;
> + int i, rc, op, op_flags = 0;
>
> if (data_direction = DMA_TO_DEVICE) {
> struct iblock_dev *ib_dev = IBLOCK_DEV(dev);
> @@ -726,7 +748,6 @@ iblock_execute_rw(struct se_cmd *cmd, struct scatterlist *sgl, u32 sgl_nents,
> if (!bio)
> goto fail_free_ibr;
>
> - bio_start = bio;
> bio_list_init(&list);
> bio_list_add(&list, bio);
>
> @@ -741,6 +762,13 @@ iblock_execute_rw(struct se_cmd *cmd, struct scatterlist *sgl, u32 sgl_nents,
> */
> while (bio_add_page(bio, sg_page(sg), sg->length, sg->offset)
> != sg->length) {
> + if (cmd->prot_type && dev->dev_attrib.pi_prot_type) {
> + rc = iblock_alloc_bip(cmd, bio, &sg_prot,
> + &skip);
> + if (rc)
> + goto fail_put_bios;
> + }
> +
> if (bio_cnt >= IBLOCK_MAX_BIO_PER_TASK) {
> iblock_submit_bios(&list);
> bio_cnt = 0;
> @@ -762,7 +790,7 @@ iblock_execute_rw(struct se_cmd *cmd, struct scatterlist *sgl, u32 sgl_nents,
> }
>
> if (cmd->prot_type && dev->dev_attrib.pi_prot_type) {
> - int rc = iblock_alloc_bip(cmd, bio_start);
> + rc = iblock_alloc_bip(cmd, bio, &sg_prot, &skip);
> if (rc)
> goto fail_put_bios;
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-21 21:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-08 19:31 [PATCH] target/iblock: split T10 PI SGL across command bios Greg Edwards
2018-08-21 21:07 ` Mike Christie [this message]
2018-08-21 22:13 ` Greg Edwards
2018-08-22 16:52 ` Greg Edwards
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5B7C7EFC.5090400@redhat.com \
--to=mchristi@redhat.com \
--cc=target-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.