From: "Zhang, Jerry (Junwei)" <Jerry.Zhang-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
To: "Christian König"
<ckoenig.leichtzumerken-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
amd-gfx-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/11] drm/amdgpu: add some VM PD/PT iterators
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2018 10:38:01 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5B972A89.60500@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180909180339.1910-5-christian.koenig-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
On 09/10/2018 02:03 AM, Christian König wrote:
> Both a leaf as well as dfs iterator to walk over all the PDs/PTs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c | 221 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 221 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
> index 416eccd9ea29..4007202585d4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
> @@ -355,6 +355,227 @@ static struct amdgpu_vm_pt *amdgpu_vm_pt_parent(struct amdgpu_vm_pt *pt)
> return list_first_entry(&parent->va, struct amdgpu_vm_pt, base.bo_list);
> }
>
> +/**
> + * amdgpu_vm_pt_cursor - state for for_each_amdgpu_vm_pt
> + */
> +struct amdgpu_vm_pt_cursor {
> + uint64_t pfn;
> + struct amdgpu_vm_pt *parent;
> + struct amdgpu_vm_pt *entry;
> + unsigned level;
> +};
> +
> +/**
> + * amdgpu_vm_pt_start - start PD/PT walk
> + *
> + * @adev: amdgpu_device pointer
> + * @vm: amdgpu_vm structure
> + * @start: start address of the walk
> + * @cursor: state to initialize
> + *
> + * Initialize a amdgpu_vm_pt_cursor to start a walk.
> + */
> +static void amdgpu_vm_pt_start(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
> + struct amdgpu_vm *vm, uint64_t start,
> + struct amdgpu_vm_pt_cursor *cursor)
> +{
> + cursor->pfn = start;
> + cursor->parent = NULL;
> + cursor->entry = &vm->root;
> + cursor->level = adev->vm_manager.root_level;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * amdgpu_vm_pt_descendant - got to child node
seems typo for "go to"
Jerry
> + *
> + * @adev: amdgpu_device pointer
> + * @cursor: current state
> + *
> + * Walk to the child node of the current node.
> + * Returns:
> + * True if the walk was possible, false otherwise.
> + */
> +static bool amdgpu_vm_pt_descendant(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
> + struct amdgpu_vm_pt_cursor *cursor)
> +{
> + unsigned num_entries, shift, idx;
> +
> + if (!cursor->entry->entries)
> + return false;
> +
> + BUG_ON(!cursor->entry->base.bo);
> + num_entries = amdgpu_vm_num_entries(adev, cursor->level);
> + shift = amdgpu_vm_level_shift(adev, cursor->level);
> +
> + ++cursor->level;
> + idx = (cursor->pfn >> shift) % num_entries;
> + cursor->parent = cursor->entry;
> + cursor->entry = &cursor->entry->entries[idx];
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * amdgpu_vm_pt_sibling - go to sibling node
> + *
> + * @adev: amdgpu_device pointer
> + * @cursor: current state
> + *
> + * Walk to the sibling node of the current node.
> + * Returns:
> + * True if the walk was possible, false otherwise.
> + */
> +static bool amdgpu_vm_pt_sibling(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
> + struct amdgpu_vm_pt_cursor *cursor)
> +{
> + unsigned shift, num_entries;
> +
> + /* Root doesn't have a sibling */
> + if (!cursor->parent)
> + return false;
> +
> + /* Go to our parents and see if we got a sibling */
> + shift = amdgpu_vm_level_shift(adev, cursor->level - 1);
> + num_entries = amdgpu_vm_num_entries(adev, cursor->level - 1);
> +
> + if (cursor->entry == &cursor->parent->entries[num_entries - 1])
> + return false;
> +
> + cursor->pfn += 1ULL << shift;
> + cursor->pfn &= ~((1ULL << shift) - 1);
> + ++cursor->entry;
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * amdgpu_vm_pt_ancestor - go to parent node
> + *
> + * @adev: amdgpu_device pointer
> + * @cursor: current state
> + *
> + * Walk to the parent node of the current node.
> + * Returns:
> + * True if the walk was possible, false otherwise.
> + */
> +static bool amdgpu_vm_pt_ancestor(struct amdgpu_vm_pt_cursor *cursor)
> +{
> + if (!cursor->parent)
> + return false;
> +
> + --cursor->level;
> + cursor->entry = cursor->parent;
> + cursor->parent = amdgpu_vm_pt_parent(cursor->parent);
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * amdgpu_vm_pt_next - get next PD/PT in hieratchy
> + *
> + * @adev: amdgpu_device pointer
> + * @cursor: current state
> + *
> + * Walk the PD/PT tree to the next node.
> + */
> +static void amdgpu_vm_pt_next(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
> + struct amdgpu_vm_pt_cursor *cursor)
> +{
> + /* First try a newborn child */
> + if (amdgpu_vm_pt_descendant(adev, cursor))
> + return;
> +
> + /* If that didn't worked try to find a sibling */
> + while (!amdgpu_vm_pt_sibling(adev, cursor)) {
> + /* No sibling, go to our parents and grandparents */
> + if (!amdgpu_vm_pt_ancestor(cursor)) {
> + cursor->pfn = ~0ll;
> + return;
> + }
> + }
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * amdgpu_vm_pt_first_leaf - get first leaf PD/PT
> + *
> + * @adev: amdgpu_device pointer
> + * @vm: amdgpu_vm structure
> + * @start: start addr of the walk
> + * @cursor: state to initialize
> + *
> + * Start a walk and go directly to the leaf node.
> + */
> +static void amdgpu_vm_pt_first_leaf(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
> + struct amdgpu_vm *vm, uint64_t start,
> + struct amdgpu_vm_pt_cursor *cursor)
> +{
> + amdgpu_vm_pt_start(adev, vm, start, cursor);
> + while (amdgpu_vm_pt_descendant(adev, cursor));
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * amdgpu_vm_pt_next_leaf - get next leaf PD/PT
> + *
> + * @adev: amdgpu_device pointer
> + * @cursor: current state
> + *
> + * Walk the PD/PT tree to the next leaf node.
> + */
> +static void amdgpu_vm_pt_next_leaf(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
> + struct amdgpu_vm_pt_cursor *cursor)
> +{
> + amdgpu_vm_pt_next(adev, cursor);
> + while (amdgpu_vm_pt_descendant(adev, cursor));
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * for_each_amdgpu_vm_pt_leaf - walk over all leaf PDs/PTs in the hierarchy
> + */
> +#define for_each_amdgpu_vm_pt_leaf(adev, vm, start, end, cursor) \
> + for (amdgpu_vm_pt_first_leaf((adev), (vm), (start), &(cursor)); \
> + (cursor).pfn <= end; amdgpu_vm_pt_next_leaf((adev), &(cursor)))
> +
> +/**
> + * amdgpu_vm_pt_first_dfs - start a deep first search
> + *
> + * @adev: amdgpu_device structure
> + * @vm: amdgpu_vm structure
> + * @cursor: state to initialize
> + *
> + * Starts a deep first traversal of the PD/PT tree.
> + */
> +static void amdgpu_vm_pt_first_dfs(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
> + struct amdgpu_vm *vm,
> + struct amdgpu_vm_pt_cursor *cursor)
> +{
> + amdgpu_vm_pt_start(adev, vm, 0, cursor);
> + while (amdgpu_vm_pt_descendant(adev, cursor));
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * amdgpu_vm_pt_next_dfs - get the next node for a deep first search
> + *
> + * @adev: amdgpu_device structure
> + * @cursor: current state
> + *
> + * Move the cursor to the next node in a deep first search.
> + */
> +static void amdgpu_vm_pt_next_dfs(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
> + struct amdgpu_vm_pt_cursor *cursor)
> +{
> + if (!cursor->parent)
> + cursor->entry = NULL;
> + else if (amdgpu_vm_pt_sibling(adev, cursor))
> + while (amdgpu_vm_pt_descendant(adev, cursor));
> + else
> + amdgpu_vm_pt_ancestor(cursor);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * for_each_amdgpu_vm_pt_dfs_safe - safe deep first search of all PDs/PTs
> + */
> +#define for_each_amdgpu_vm_pt_dfs_safe(adev, vm, cursor, entry) \
> + for (amdgpu_vm_pt_first_dfs((adev), (vm), &(cursor)), \
> + (entry) = (cursor).entry; (entry); (entry) = (cursor).entry, \
> + amdgpu_vm_pt_next_dfs((adev), &(cursor)))
> +
> /**
> * amdgpu_vm_get_pd_bo - add the VM PD to a validation list
> *
>
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-11 2:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-09 18:03 Optimize VM handling a bit more Christian König
[not found] ` <20180909180339.1910-1-christian.koenig-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2018-09-09 18:03 ` [PATCH 01/11] drm/amdgpu: try allocating VRAM as power of two Christian König
[not found] ` <20180909180339.1910-2-christian.koenig-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2018-09-11 0:08 ` Felix Kuehling
[not found] ` <60b9c96a-d31d-cd61-df22-c8414f0166dc-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2018-09-11 6:49 ` Christian König
[not found] ` <9b61bb4c-4721-c8af-0810-4ecc18ed1ea4-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2018-09-11 7:37 ` Michel Dänzer
[not found] ` <46b7da24-4b04-7daf-e6c3-07e10ecb6fd6-otUistvHUpPR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org>
2018-09-11 7:46 ` Christian König
[not found] ` <d0af0309-e4f9-9825-fd30-9cf79ed5f823-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2018-09-11 7:55 ` Michel Dänzer
[not found] ` <5fd331d0-24ab-7540-2d0a-b227230743c0-otUistvHUpPR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org>
2018-09-11 8:20 ` Christian König
[not found] ` <a3c91610-e5e2-c666-cfda-344f1f40485c-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2018-09-11 8:25 ` Michel Dänzer
2018-09-11 14:27 ` Kuehling, Felix
[not found] ` <DM5PR12MB17073F8B673AEFC092FBA5B392040-2J9CzHegvk9TCtO+SvGBKwdYzm3356FpvxpqHgZTriW3zl9H0oFU5g@public.gmane.org>
2018-09-11 14:48 ` Christian König
[not found] ` <2361b55f-ed56-bd42-b628-fc001d9ea300-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2018-09-11 22:25 ` Felix Kuehling
2018-09-11 9:50 ` Huang Rui
2018-09-11 11:16 ` Christian König
2018-09-09 18:03 ` [PATCH 02/11] drm/amdgpu: add amdgpu_vm_pt_parent helper Christian König
2018-09-09 18:03 ` [PATCH 03/11] drm/amdgpu: add amdgpu_vm_update_func Christian König
2018-09-09 18:03 ` [PATCH 04/11] drm/amdgpu: add some VM PD/PT iterators Christian König
[not found] ` <20180909180339.1910-5-christian.koenig-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2018-09-11 1:51 ` Felix Kuehling
2018-09-11 2:38 ` Zhang, Jerry (Junwei) [this message]
2018-09-09 18:03 ` [PATCH 05/11] drm/amdgpu: use leaf iterator for allocating PD/PT Christian König
2018-09-09 18:03 ` [PATCH 06/11] drm/amdgpu: use dfs iterator to free PDs/PTs Christian König
2018-09-09 18:03 ` [PATCH 07/11] drm/amdgpu: use the DFS iterator in amdgpu_vm_invalidate_level Christian König
[not found] ` <20180909180339.1910-8-christian.koenig-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2018-09-11 0:19 ` Felix Kuehling
2018-09-09 18:03 ` [PATCH 08/11] drm/amdgpu: use leaf iterator for filling PTs Christian König
2018-09-09 18:03 ` [PATCH 09/11] drm/amdgpu: meld together VM fragment and huge page handling Christian König
2018-09-09 18:03 ` [PATCH 10/11] drm/amdgpu: use the maximum possible fragment size on Vega/Raven Christian König
[not found] ` <20180909180339.1910-11-christian.koenig-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2018-09-11 0:45 ` Felix Kuehling
2018-09-09 18:03 ` [PATCH 11/11] drm/amdgpu: allow fragment processing for invalid PTEs Christian König
2018-09-11 2:17 ` Optimize VM handling a bit more Felix Kuehling
2018-09-11 2:39 ` Zhang, Jerry (Junwei)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5B972A89.60500@amd.com \
--to=jerry.zhang-5c7gfcevmho@public.gmane.org \
--cc=amd-gfx-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ckoenig.leichtzumerken-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.