From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3AD80C4332F for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2022 00:30:38 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References: In-Reply-To:Subject:CC:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=+lm4C/j72/jIEOVoVmSxAHhNBS7m95jOm+96qGkKuRY=; b=OR1ViItvgFTXVc GPlfkOwdCsjiu1pPySIXqpX7uMJIEly77FKBuUDIpTJdEIa0yCLRZefiH8enGjHeYBSn26u2hNfrR w2ctWsniHiWxyzCpwI+hYdL/kTXGuF4AAgtlGvqaysRzB/fqWsi+fur/G/T/0dMcii3r/652P4U3a uZ2527eNkUXP+4ZHOJVknT9v3LSYTM46ZQ62FZzsRkxJZ1mxZzCaPp/Igmgcaxgu7eVm0EiRdLuGU +CKXAIVskVPe9/aeXuUNX0Y0eTgDwhD0LKHe0Bon0l7+rdKCzChz2AXQ7wa1pKvZchw6ZqdTHVXFr 2AXoCcR/2+emx+MrS8tQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1p89Tg-004w5W-KG; Thu, 22 Dec 2022 00:30:28 +0000 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org ([2604:1380:4601:e00::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1p89TN-004w2k-Fr for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 22 Dec 2022 00:30:11 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE19BB81BE5; Thu, 22 Dec 2022 00:30:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B4D6BC433EF; Thu, 22 Dec 2022 00:30:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1671669003; bh=W3ieMBH1py2ivn2gYCl7Hf6einZeemiSyRBDMxO+2co=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=LC7pVYH9rem06N0nQg5JO40wJEmhJz4oDd7vtKrq6OgFKM0epZ8YtmjEJoiOtm00R YI1BMuCHJ/YYMVe9ztbCxACHk9Tub7A4kCcDGA4omlJfJBjKWiGz/0HpiHLmq9OswB VH2zaMQYMrH/EvRz6oQbC1O+JbEt0Z2q3zgF9lcxtTC0elauT8WniN5GpSRP9M8lgl X9jPcOFpGOJ3VPxjJgOngXteJW/ohsPAlP5bMaSYSnVR4XeMiEQC0KT0XYxCRok03s W/0PapvkB62OTr1yp5fL+2ry77CC9MDW4vAk6z/6D/ZWagSbNi6nWjxMbRg2eynPXa TCzIAed7Z3DhQ== Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2022 00:29:56 +0000 From: Conor Dooley To: Changbin Du , Guo Ren CC: Conor Dooley , palmer@dabbelt.com, paul.walmsley@sifive.com, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, mhiramat@kernel.org, changbin.du@intel.com, zong.li@sifive.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, boqun.feng@gmail.com, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] riscv: patch: Fixup lockdep warning in stop_machine User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: <20221222001902.zcbwlvqaitvsfb33@mail.google.com> References: <20221120101049.2078117-1-guoren@kernel.org> <20221222001902.zcbwlvqaitvsfb33@mail.google.com> Message-ID: <5CA9DB64-CE90-490A-835B-0FC4550E5D9A@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20221221_163009_719307_C9F4A1A2 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 17.94 ) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 22 December 2022 00:19:02 GMT, Changbin Du wrote: >Hello, >Does this patch get merged into riscv tree now? This problem has been there for a long >time. (I suppose you have received my previous reponse.) As far as I can tell, this patch is still missing a sign-off from you. There's nothing in response to this thread that I can see which provides one. > >On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 07:09:45PM +0800, Guo Ren wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 6:13 PM Conor Dooley wrote: >> > >> > On Sun, Nov 20, 2022 at 05:10:49AM -0500, guoren@kernel.org wrote: >> > > From: Changbin Du >> > >> > > Fixes: 0ff7c3b33127 ("riscv: Use text_mutex instead of patch_lock") >> > > Cc: Changbin Du >> > > Co-developed-by: Guo Ren >> > > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren >> > > Cc: Zong Li >> > > Cc: Palmer Dabbelt >> > > --- >> > >> > Hey Guo Ren, >> > >> > FYI you're missing a SoB from Chanbin on this patch. They gave one in >> > their v1 though so you should be able to re-use that? >> I'm waiting for his SoB. I don't think I could directly use his SoB in >> v1. I need him to confirm my rewritten commit log for lockdep >> analysis. >> >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Conor. >> > >> > > Changes in v2: >> > > - Rewrite commit log with lockdep explanation [Guo Ren] >> > > - Rebase on v6.1 [Guo Ren] >> > > >> > > v1: >> > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20210417023532.354714-1-changbin.du@gmail.com/ >> > >> >> >> -- >> Best Regards >> Guo Ren > _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83C5BC4332F for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2022 00:30:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234729AbiLVAaL (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Dec 2022 19:30:11 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48314 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229742AbiLVAaI (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Dec 2022 19:30:08 -0500 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4601:e00::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 262F6218AE for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2022 16:30:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B002BB81BE6 for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2022 00:30:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B4D6BC433EF; Thu, 22 Dec 2022 00:30:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1671669003; bh=W3ieMBH1py2ivn2gYCl7Hf6einZeemiSyRBDMxO+2co=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=LC7pVYH9rem06N0nQg5JO40wJEmhJz4oDd7vtKrq6OgFKM0epZ8YtmjEJoiOtm00R YI1BMuCHJ/YYMVe9ztbCxACHk9Tub7A4kCcDGA4omlJfJBjKWiGz/0HpiHLmq9OswB VH2zaMQYMrH/EvRz6oQbC1O+JbEt0Z2q3zgF9lcxtTC0elauT8WniN5GpSRP9M8lgl X9jPcOFpGOJ3VPxjJgOngXteJW/ohsPAlP5bMaSYSnVR4XeMiEQC0KT0XYxCRok03s W/0PapvkB62OTr1yp5fL+2ry77CC9MDW4vAk6z/6D/ZWagSbNi6nWjxMbRg2eynPXa TCzIAed7Z3DhQ== Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2022 00:29:56 +0000 From: Conor Dooley To: Changbin Du , Guo Ren CC: Conor Dooley , palmer@dabbelt.com, paul.walmsley@sifive.com, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, mhiramat@kernel.org, changbin.du@intel.com, zong.li@sifive.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, boqun.feng@gmail.com, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] riscv: patch: Fixup lockdep warning in stop_machine User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: <20221222001902.zcbwlvqaitvsfb33@mail.google.com> References: <20221120101049.2078117-1-guoren@kernel.org> <20221222001902.zcbwlvqaitvsfb33@mail.google.com> Message-ID: <5CA9DB64-CE90-490A-835B-0FC4550E5D9A@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 22 December 2022 00:19:02 GMT, Changbin Du = wrote: >Hello, >Does this patch get merged into riscv tree now? This problem has been the= re for a long >time=2E (I suppose you have received my previous reponse=2E) As far as I can tell, this patch is still missing a sign-off from you=2E There's nothing in response to this thread that I can see which provides o= ne=2E > >On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 07:09:45PM +0800, Guo Ren wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 6:13 PM Conor Dooley wrote: >> > >> > On Sun, Nov 20, 2022 at 05:10:49AM -0500, guoren@kernel=2Eorg wrote: >> > > From: Changbin Du >> > >> > > Fixes: 0ff7c3b33127 ("riscv: Use text_mutex instead of patch_lock") >> > > Cc: Changbin Du >> > > Co-developed-by: Guo Ren >> > > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren >> > > Cc: Zong Li >> > > Cc: Palmer Dabbelt >> > > --- >> > >> > Hey Guo Ren, >> > >> > FYI you're missing a SoB from Chanbin on this patch=2E They gave one = in >> > their v1 though so you should be able to re-use that? >> I'm waiting for his SoB=2E I don't think I could directly use his SoB i= n >> v1=2E I need him to confirm my rewritten commit log for lockdep >> analysis=2E >>=20 >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Conor=2E >> > >> > > Changes in v2: >> > > - Rewrite commit log with lockdep explanation [Guo Ren] >> > > - Rebase on v6=2E1 [Guo Ren] >> > > >> > > v1: >> > > https://lore=2Ekernel=2Eorg/linux-riscv/20210417023532=2E354714-1-c= hangbin=2Edu@gmail=2Ecom/ >> > >>=20 >>=20 >> --=20 >> Best Regards >> Guo Ren >