From: "Yu, Mingli" <mingli.yu@windriver.com>
To: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@gmail.com>
Cc: openembedded-devel <openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [meta-oe][PATCH] libseccomp: import from meta-security
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2019 10:31:06 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5D3A65EA.9090601@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADkTA4N3zMSfjBe=eOvvbrArfXEenwpYZcJGgwqt2Mhrr-1tGw@mail.gmail.com>
On 2019年07月25日 21:45, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 3:06 AM <mingli.yu@windriver.com> wrote:
>>
>> From: Mingli Yu <Mingli.Yu@windriver.com>
>
> Can you share some details as to why this should be pulled from
> meta-security into a different repo ?
Considering there is also some security related recipe under
meta-oe/recipes-security/, I think it's not strange to add a new one
libseccomp and libseccomp also provides a basic common filtering mechanism.
Meanwhile, the below yocto compliance check error disappears once we
move libseccomp from meta-security to meta-oe.
ERROR: Nothing PROVIDES 'libseccomp' (but
/buildarea/layers/meta-virtualization/recipes-containers/cri-o/cri-o_git.bb
DEPENDS on or otherwise requires it).
Close matches:
libcomps
ERROR: Required build target 'meta-world-pkgdata' has no buildable
providers.
Missing or unbuildable dependency chain was: ['meta-world-pkgdata',
'cri-o', 'libseccomp']
Thanks,
>
> It seems to fit the mandate of meta-security quite nicely ;)
>
> Is there some sort of dependency issue, or other technical problem
> that is causing a problem ?
>
> Bruce
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mingli Yu <Mingli.Yu@windriver.com>
>> ---
>> .../recipes-security/libseccomp/files/run-ptest | 4 +++
>> .../libseccomp/libseccomp_2.4.1.bb | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 45 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 meta-oe/recipes-security/libseccomp/files/run-ptest
>> create mode 100644 meta-oe/recipes-security/libseccomp/libseccomp_2.4.1.bb
>>
>> diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-security/libseccomp/files/run-ptest b/meta-oe/recipes-security/libseccomp/files/run-ptest
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..54b4a63
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-security/libseccomp/files/run-ptest
>> @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
>> +#!/bin/sh
>> +
>> +cd tests
>> +./regression -a
>> diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-security/libseccomp/libseccomp_2.4.1.bb b/meta-oe/recipes-security/libseccomp/libseccomp_2.4.1.bb
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..dba1be5
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-security/libseccomp/libseccomp_2.4.1.bb
>> @@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
>> +SUMMARY = "interface to seccomp filtering mechanism"
>> +DESCRIPTION = "The libseccomp library provides and easy to use, platform independent,interface to the Linux Kernel's syscall filtering mechanism: seccomp."
>> +SECTION = "security"
>> +LICENSE = "LGPL-2.1"
>> +LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://LICENSE;beginline=0;endline=1;md5=8eac08d22113880357ceb8e7c37f989f"
>> +
>> +SRCREV = "fb43972ea1aab24f2a70193fb7445c2674f594e3"
>> +
>> +SRC_URI = "git://github.com/seccomp/libseccomp.git;branch=release-2.4 \
>> + file://run-ptest \
>> +"
>> +
>> +S = "${WORKDIR}/git"
>> +
>> +inherit autotools-brokensep pkgconfig ptest
>> +
>> +PACKAGECONFIG ??= ""
>> +PACKAGECONFIG[python] = "--enable-python, --disable-python, python"
>> +
>> +do_compile_ptest() {
>> + oe_runmake -C tests check-build
>> +}
>> +
>> +do_install_ptest() {
>> + install -d ${D}${PTEST_PATH}/tests
>> + install -d ${D}${PTEST_PATH}/tools
>> + for file in $(find tests/* -executable -type f); do
>> + install -m 744 ${S}/${file} ${D}/${PTEST_PATH}/tests
>> + done
>> + for file in $(find tests/*.tests -type f); do
>> + install -m 744 ${S}/${file} ${D}/${PTEST_PATH}/tests
>> + done
>> + for file in $(find tools/* -executable -type f); do
>> + install -m 744 ${S}/${file} ${D}/${PTEST_PATH}/tools
>> + done
>> +}
>> +
>> +FILES_${PN} = "${bindir} ${libdir}/${BPN}.so*"
>> +FILES_${PN}-dbg += "${libdir}/${PN}/tests/.debug/* ${libdir}/${PN}/tools/.debug"
>> +
>> +RDEPENDS_${PN}-ptest = "bash"
>> --
>> 2.7.4
>>
>> --
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openembedded-devel mailing list
>> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
>> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-26 2:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-25 7:06 [meta-oe][PATCH] libseccomp: import from meta-security mingli.yu
2019-07-25 13:45 ` Bruce Ashfield
2019-07-26 2:31 ` Yu, Mingli [this message]
2019-07-26 2:46 ` Bruce Ashfield
2019-07-26 3:04 ` Yu, Mingli
2019-07-26 3:23 ` Bruce Ashfield
2019-07-26 8:51 ` Yu, Mingli
2019-07-26 8:59 ` akuster808
2019-07-26 22:27 ` Khem Raj
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5D3A65EA.9090601@windriver.com \
--to=mingli.yu@windriver.com \
--cc=bruce.ashfield@gmail.com \
--cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.