From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 References: <5D53D882.5090803@huawei.com> From: piaojun Message-ID: <5D59F1E9.4090509@huawei.com> Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2019 08:48:41 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5D53D882.5090803@huawei.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Virtio-fs] [PATCH][RFC] viriofsd: do not fall back to buffer io when cache=auto List-Id: Development discussions about virtio-fs List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: virtio-fs@redhat.com Ping, any comments on this patch? On 2019/8/14 17:46, piaojun wrote: > Direct io flags will be tured off even if cache=auto, which seems a > little bit strange. It's better to keep the open flags set by user. If > I missed the discussion about this issue, please let me know, thanks. > > Signed-off-by: Jun Piao > --- > contrib/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c | 4 ++++ > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/contrib/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c b/contrib/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c > index 321bbb2..a080f0d 100644 > --- a/contrib/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c > +++ b/contrib/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c > @@ -1687,6 +1687,8 @@ static void lo_create(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t parent, const char *name, > fi->direct_io = 1; > else if (lo->cache == CACHE_ALWAYS) > fi->keep_cache = 1; > + else > + fi->direct_io = !!(fi->flags & O_DIRECT); > > out: > lo_inode_put(lo, &parent_inode); > @@ -1899,6 +1901,8 @@ static void lo_open(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t ino, struct fuse_file_info *fi) > fi->direct_io = 1; > else if (lo->cache == CACHE_ALWAYS) > fi->keep_cache = 1; > + else > + fi->direct_io = !!(fi->flags & O_DIRECT); > fuse_reply_open(req, fi); > } >