From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail1.windriver.com (mail1.windriver.com [147.11.146.13]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74A677F959 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 03:02:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca.corp.ad.wrs.com [147.11.189.40]) by mail1.windriver.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 00K32lkA017620 (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sun, 19 Jan 2020 19:02:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from [128.224.162.144] (128.224.162.144) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.468.0; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 19:02:46 -0800 To: Peter Kjellerstedt , Paul Eggleton References: <1579405812-336202-1-git-send-email-mingli.yu@windriver.com> <20200119053240.2276.68036@do> <5E23EC1D.2080407@windriver.com> <2583767.pvHsQr8YWX@shodan> <5E250399.1000807@windriver.com> <54d24332531b41c2a29671f2181f9458@XBOX03.axis.com> From: "Yu, Mingli" Message-ID: <5E2518BC.7090306@windriver.com> Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 11:04:28 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <54d24332531b41c2a29671f2181f9458@XBOX03.axis.com> X-Originating-IP: [128.224.162.144] Cc: "openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org" Subject: =?UTF-8?B?UmU6IOKclyBwYXRjaHRlc3Q6IGZhaWx1cmUgZm9yIE9wZW4gZmlsZSB3aXRoIE9fQ0xPRVhFQyB0byBhdm9pZCBmZCBsZWFrIChyZXYzKQ==?= X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 03:02:59 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 01/20/20 10:28, Peter Kjellerstedt wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: openembedded-core-bounces@lists.openembedded.org > bounces@lists.openembedded.org> On Behalf Of Yu, Mingli >> Sent: den 20 januari 2020 02:34 >> To: Paul Eggleton >> Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org >> Subject: Re: [OE-core] ✗ patchtest: failure for Open file with O_CLOEXEC >> to avoid fd leak (rev3) >> >> On 01/20/20 09:29, Paul Eggleton wrote: >>> Hi Mingli >>> >>> On Sunday, 19 January 2020 6:41:49 PM NZDT Yu, Mingli wrote: >>>> On 01/19/20 13:32, Patchwork wrote: >>>>> == Series Details == >>>>> >>>>> Series: Open file with O_CLOEXEC to avoid fd leak (rev3) >>>>> Revision: 3 >>>>> URL : https://patchwork.openembedded.org/series/22123/ >>>>> State : failure >>>>> >>>>> == Summary == >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thank you for submitting this patch series to OpenEmbedded Core. This >> is >>>>> an automated response. Several tests have been executed on the >> proposed >>>>> series by patchtest resulting in the following failures: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> * Issue Series does not apply on top of target branch >> [test_series_merge_on_head] >>>>> Suggested fix Rebase your series on top of targeted branch >>>>> Targeted branch master (currently at 9d7a521971) >>>> >>>> Have already rebased on the master branch of >>>> http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/pseudo/, why still issue out >>>> the above issue? Any hint? >>> >>> It's assuming that patches sent to this list are for OE-Core (which they >>> generally are). I wasn't aware but apparently the documented place to >>> send pseudo patches is this list, so I think in this case you can just >>> ignore patchtest. >> >> Okay, many thanks Paul for your hint! >> >> Thanks, >> >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Paul > > But it is probably a good idea to include a "[pseudo]" tag in the subject > when sending patches related to pseudo to this list, as the expectation > otherwise is that they are for OE-Core. Thanks Peter! And already add the "pseudo_util.c" tag in the subject in the v3, please check the mail with the subject "[OE-core] [PATCH v3] pseudo_util.c: Open file with O_CLOEXEC to avoid fd leak". Thanks, > > //Peter >