From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail5.wrs.com (mail5.windriver.com [192.103.53.11]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 525457FBEF for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 03:27:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca.corp.ad.wrs.com [147.11.189.40]) by mail5.wrs.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 00K3QM8s004970 (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sun, 19 Jan 2020 19:26:38 -0800 Received: from [128.224.162.144] (128.224.162.144) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.468.0; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 19:26:18 -0800 To: Peter Kjellerstedt , Paul Eggleton References: <1579405812-336202-1-git-send-email-mingli.yu@windriver.com> <20200119053240.2276.68036@do> <5E23EC1D.2080407@windriver.com> <2583767.pvHsQr8YWX@shodan> <5E250399.1000807@windriver.com> <54d24332531b41c2a29671f2181f9458@XBOX03.axis.com> <5E2518BC.7090306@windriver.com> From: "Yu, Mingli" Message-ID: <5E251E3F.5070703@windriver.com> Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 11:27:59 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Originating-IP: [128.224.162.144] Cc: "openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org" Subject: =?UTF-8?B?UmU6IOKclyBwYXRjaHRlc3Q6IGZhaWx1cmUgZm9yIE9wZW4gZmlsZSB3aXRoIE9fQ0xPRVhFQyB0byBhdm9pZCBmZCBsZWFrIChyZXYzKQ==?= X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 03:27:42 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 01/20/20 11:15, Peter Kjellerstedt wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Yu, Mingli >> Sent: den 20 januari 2020 04:04 >> To: Peter Kjellerstedt ; Paul Eggleton >> >> Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org >> Subject: Re: [OE-core] ✗ patchtest: failure for Open file with O_CLOEXEC >> to avoid fd leak (rev3) >> >> On 01/20/20 10:28, Peter Kjellerstedt wrote: >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: openembedded-core-bounces@lists.openembedded.org > core- >>>> bounces@lists.openembedded.org> On Behalf Of Yu, Mingli >>>> Sent: den 20 januari 2020 02:34 >>>> To: Paul Eggleton >>>> Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org >>>> Subject: Re: [OE-core] ✗ patchtest: failure for Open file with >> O_CLOEXEC >>>> to avoid fd leak (rev3) >>>> >>>> On 01/20/20 09:29, Paul Eggleton wrote: >>>>> Hi Mingli >>>>> >>>>> On Sunday, 19 January 2020 6:41:49 PM NZDT Yu, Mingli wrote: >>>>>> On 01/19/20 13:32, Patchwork wrote: >>>>>>> == Series Details == >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Series: Open file with O_CLOEXEC to avoid fd leak (rev3) >>>>>>> Revision: 3 >>>>>>> URL : https://patchwork.openembedded.org/series/22123/ >>>>>>> State : failure >>>>>>> >>>>>>> == Summary == >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thank you for submitting this patch series to OpenEmbedded Core. >> This >>>> is >>>>>>> an automated response. Several tests have been executed on the >>>> proposed >>>>>>> series by patchtest resulting in the following failures: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> * Issue Series does not apply on top of target branch >>>> [test_series_merge_on_head] >>>>>>> Suggested fix Rebase your series on top of targeted branch >>>>>>> Targeted branch master (currently at 9d7a521971) >>>>>> >>>>>> Have already rebased on the master branch of >>>>>> http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/pseudo/, why still issue >> out >>>>>> the above issue? Any hint? >>>>> >>>>> It's assuming that patches sent to this list are for OE-Core (which >> they >>>>> generally are). I wasn't aware but apparently the documented place to >>>>> send pseudo patches is this list, so I think in this case you can just >>>>> ignore patchtest. >>>> >>>> Okay, many thanks Paul for your hint! >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Paul >>> >>> But it is probably a good idea to include a "[pseudo]" tag in the >> subject >>> when sending patches related to pseudo to this list, as the expectation >>> otherwise is that they are for OE-Core. >> >> Thanks Peter! And already add the "pseudo_util.c" tag in the subject in >> the v3, please check the mail with the subject "[OE-core] [PATCH v3] >> pseudo_util.c: Open file with O_CLOEXEC to avoid fd leak". > > That is not the same. The "pseudo_util.c:" is part of the commit subject > and will end up in the Git repository. A "[pseudo]" tag is for anyone > seeing the mail (possibly including patchwork and patchtest), letting > them know that this commit is about pseudo, not OE-Core (similar to the > "[PATCH v3]" tag, which is also information about the commit). Got it! V4 is incoming. Thanks, > >> Thanks, >> >>> //Peter > > //Peter >