From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail2.candelatech.com ([208.74.158.173] helo=mail3.candelatech.com) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1j4916-0005Ml-RG for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 19:58:50 +0000 Message-ID: <5E4C41F3.2000500@candelatech.com> Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 11:58:43 -0800 From: Ben Greear MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Management rate-control on IPQ4019 References: <20543d04-7847-8a4f-7882-78c2f42c98c0@david-bauer.net> In-Reply-To: <20543d04-7847-8a4f-7882-78c2f42c98c0@david-bauer.net> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: David Bauer , ath10k@lists.infradead.org On 02/18/2020 11:12 AM, David Bauer wrote: > Hello, > > while playing around with the 2.4GHz WiFi part of the IPQ4019, i was > expecting being able to set the rate at which IPQ4019 transmits it's beacon > frames. > > Using OpenWrt, setting "legacy_rates=0" on the radio leads to only advertising > 802.11g speeds, however the beacons are still sent out at 1 Mbit/s. Using a QCA9984, > the beacons are correctly sent out at the lowest 802.11g rate (6 Mbit/s). So i assume > this is either a bug in the ath10k firmware or a hardware-shortcoming. Has anyone else > experienced this bug and is it likely we'll see it fixed in a later firmware release? > > Hardware: IPQ4029 (Aruba AP-303) > Firmware Version: 10.4-3.6-00140 / 10.4-3.5.3-00078 There are separate API for setting management frame rates. I forget exactly how upstream supports this, but maybe check debugfs? Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k