Re: [PATCH v3] migration/xbzrle: add encoding rate

[Wei Wang <wei.w.wang@intel.com>]

On 06/05/2020 12:57 AM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 6/4/20 3:27 AM, Wei Wang wrote:
>> On 06/04/2020 05:38 PM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
>>> Hmm OK; I'll admit to not liking NaN/Inf in output.
>>>
>>> Dave
>>>
>> OK. To deal with the reported issue, how about using FLT_MAX (as opposed to
>> UINT64_MAX or inf):
>> xbzrle_counters.encoding_rate = FLT_MAX;
> So you'd rather see 340282346638528859811704183484516925440.00 printed?
>
> It's arbitrary and not correct in any mathematical sense.
>
> If you *really* insist on not printing Inf (which may have some diagnostic
> value), then 0 is just as arbitrary, and at least smaller in the output.

0 works fine (though it logically means the lowest encoding rate).
I slightly prefer the biggest number or inf, which naturally means it's 
very encoding friendly.
Let's see if Dave has any thought about the choices :)

Best,
Wei