From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,HTML_MESSAGE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9177CC433DF for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 19:16:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56E2D207CD for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 19:16:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=mindspring.com header.i=@mindspring.com header.b="p6D/kx5w" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 56E2D207CD Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=mindspring.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:37712 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jrneh-0002Fa-KF for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Sat, 04 Jul 2020 15:16:55 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48294) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jrndG-00010L-Hu for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 04 Jul 2020 15:15:26 -0400 Received: from elasmtp-masked.atl.sa.earthlink.net ([209.86.89.68]:41934) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jrndE-0002aD-DF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 04 Jul 2020 15:15:26 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mindspring.com; s=dk12062016; t=1593890124; bh=rWfiki62H/m6w6n+NHPQ7FEqI1ky8Jvhhgrf TnZb360=; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version: To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:X-ELNK-Trace: X-Originating-IP; b=p6D/kx5wnzH/c0ijNZr16qLYtReDOIzwqmat5J6yJOdB7Q +hPAdqHJhLtAruyThoRSxDx+LKVUS8krsNKtobQat502OlnkKgwAnfYaiz97dv5VQPH 1sbOnR7KymxwKbF+TqQMuK7GqkKIj3DR8h2+2xTc2GnKnfcFzZ24bvpE4PprqAx28R3 11wi8+3/TPy4qskqJa/d44Qn6l4nGyHaZRMPRgfMFS43rnQdBCuJz6ZOlZJp6S8ALZm I4sTmWzHWnOH2DI6GhsmN/lzr7ClQHKkxpRxMXizY20FJoL3j/26ckRqaDuz0f/x9sv Qwq2IT3frAMb8cfNDR81HvSx/2pA== DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk12062016; d=mindspring.com; b=p0rivGb2Ph3bn3tLvTpF2Gk8xKDjiJ21cvNWW+Ozc4R2/FnQRFbanylPpBrXBh0ZdoNJ7em8GcuF7dMCuhtB+cRDKwL0hPwzULKi/DF4PCcZ9bDk28XmRGhT6gNP8h8IGy+T1MzMa95PnT8DPv9PXoRzi/mS38KdWtw4CttMSJQPIzuo/BNU0U+QaNS1J3kq5khhHShCcBcNwAvk07VOkkpATeQRgk2lhGntDhxFZntnTlLaRiflAXzfrXf5pqWQmNxMhoeZ9ZnVyKvApVCVNya7LdWO9BnwpSg1nnZ0WJVX6yFkmlQtb5RmH2G8JG6pPmT5IfcE2hXvHqUKqEAA8g==; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; Received: from [8.9.81.230] (helo=[192.168.0.78]) by elasmtp-masked.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpa (Exim 4) (envelope-from ) id 1jrndA-00039c-NA; Sat, 04 Jul 2020 15:15:20 -0400 Message-ID: <5F00D548.5050305@mindspring.com> Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2020 15:15:20 -0400 From: Michele Denber User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; SunOS sun4v; rv:10.0.7) Gecko/20121005 Thunderbird/10.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?UGhpbGlwcGUgTWF0aGlldS1EYXVkw6k=?= Subject: Re: gmake in Solaris 11.4: TFR missing References: <20200702143955.678-1-thuth@redhat.com> <5EFE07BC.6040407@mindspring.com> <1e699fdc-639e-ef8a-313f-7e665cad868c@redhat.com> <5EFE5291.6030300@mindspring.com> <975b5072-43de-da16-bf62-fc7e5a7a87f5@redhat.com> <5EFF5DFC.2060006@mindspring.com> <5EFF7DD7.1000605@mindspring.com> <5EFFA499.7050008@mindspring.com> <3474053c-12d7-cf4a-5470-62845c166127@redhat.com> <5F00A1ED.6040909@mindspring.com> <69adae2a-8c3c-ec17-08f4-c2109b1d0993@amsat.org> In-Reply-To: <69adae2a-8c3c-ec17-08f4-c2109b1d0993@amsat.org> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------060407050906070105000507" X-ELNK-Trace: 17a948d2f1835c375e89bb4777695beb24867385ea7beca560f253835c45648768724f8d9b219674350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 8.9.81.230 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.86.89.68; envelope-from=denber@mindspring.com; helo=elasmtp-masked.atl.sa.earthlink.net X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/07/04 15:15:22 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.11 and newer [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Peter Maydell , Thomas Huth , Peter Tribble , QEMU Developers Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------060407050906070105000507 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 07/04/20 11:57, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > Odd... > > Assuming you are using gcc, have you tried 'configure --host-cc=gcc'? OK, so I changed it from # /opt/csw/bin/bash ./configure --cc=gcc --extra-cflags="-m32" to # /opt/csw/bin/bash ./configure --cc=gcc --extra-cflags="-m32" --host-cc=gcc and then reran gmake -j16. That seems to have fixed it. ppc64 is there now: root@hemlock:~/qemu-5.0.0# ppc64-softmmu/qemu-system-ppc64 -machine help Supported machines are: 40p IBM RS/6000 7020 (40p) bamboo bamboo g3beige Heathrow based PowerMAC mac99 Mac99 based PowerMAC mpc8544ds mpc8544ds ... and a bunch more ... root@hemlock:~/qemu-5.0.0# And I also have the right stuff in x86_64-softmmu. So I tried running my Win XP image and it started up OK, opening the QEMU window and displaying the XP logo. But unfortunately it's really really slow, like 20 minutes just to get to the XP desktop appearing. That takes about 2 minutes in QEMU 2.12 on the same host hardware. I had been hoping 5.0 would be faster. Is there a reason for it to be an order of magnitude slower? I'm saying: root@hemlock:~/qemu-5.0.0/x86_64-softmmu# ./qemu-system-x86_64 -m 2047 -usb -device usb-tablet -smp 3 -device rtl8139,netdev=net0 -netdev user,id=net0 -boot d -hda /bkpool/qemuimages/XP.img -cdrom /bkpool/qemuimages/xp.iso & But in any case, I will now cautiously claim that I have succeeded in building QEMU 5.0 in Solaris 11.4 SPARC. Thanks very much to everyone for all your help. - Michele --------------060407050906070105000507 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 07/04/20 11:57, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
Odd...

Assuming you are using gcc, have you tried 'configure --host-cc=gcc'?
OK, so I changed it from

# /opt/csw/bin/bash ./configure --cc=gcc  --extra-cflags="-m32"

to

# /opt/csw/bin/bash ./configure --cc=gcc  --extra-cflags="-m32" --host-cc=gcc

and then reran gmake -j16.   That seems to have fixed it.  ppc64 is there now:

root@hemlock:~/qemu-5.0.0# ppc64-softmmu/qemu-system-ppc64 -machine help
Supported machines are:
40p                  IBM RS/6000 7020 (40p)
bamboo               bamboo
g3beige              Heathrow based PowerMAC
mac99                Mac99 based PowerMAC
mpc8544ds            mpc8544ds
... and a bunch more ...
root@hemlock:~/qemu-5.0.0#

And I also have the right stuff in x86_64-softmmu.  So I tried running my Win XP image and it started up OK, opening the QEMU window and displaying the XP logo.  But unfortunately it's really really slow, like 20 minutes just to get to the XP desktop appearing.  That takes about 2 minutes in QEMU 2.12 on the same host hardware.  I had been hoping 5.0 would be faster.  Is there a reason for it to be an order of magnitude slower?  I'm saying:

root@hemlock:~/qemu-5.0.0/x86_64-softmmu# ./qemu-system-x86_64  -m 2047  -usb -device usb-tablet -smp 3 -device rtl8139,netdev=net0 -netdev user,id=net0 -boot d -hda  /bkpool/qemuimages/XP.img -cdrom /bkpool/qemuimages/xp.iso &

But in any case, I will now cautiously claim  that I have succeeded in building QEMU 5.0 in Solaris 11.4 SPARC.  Thanks very much to everyone for all your help.

            - Michele


--------------060407050906070105000507--