From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.90_1) id 1khjR5-00043S-Fu for mharc-qemu-trivial@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 20:17:31 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54524) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1khjR3-00040S-0k; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 20:17:29 -0500 Received: from szxga05-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.191]:2463) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1khjR0-0001vd-7k; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 20:17:28 -0500 Received: from DGGEMS401-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.60]) by szxga05-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4CgjfD4b7jzLtl0; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 09:16:52 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.174.187.138] (10.174.187.138) by DGGEMS401-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.201) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.487.0; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 09:17:11 +0800 Message-ID: <5FBDB096.3040600@huawei.com> Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2020 09:17:10 +0800 From: Alex Chen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Maydell CC: zhanghailiang , QEMU Trivial , Michael Tokarev , Yuval Shaia , QEMU , , Laurent Vivier Subject: Re: [PATCH] contrib/rdmacm-mux: Fix error condition in hash_tbl_search_fd_by_ifid() References: <5F9AC6FF.4000301@huawei.com> <5FBCF8F0.9060103@huawei.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: [10.174.187.138] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Received-SPF: pass client-ip=45.249.212.191; envelope-from=alex.chen@huawei.com; helo=szxga05-in.huawei.com X-Spam_score_int: -41 X-Spam_score: -4.2 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2020 01:17:29 -0000 On 2020/11/24 23:29, Peter Maydell wrote: > On Tue, 24 Nov 2020 at 12:15, Alex Chen wrote: >> >> Hi everyone， >> >> Who can help me merge this patch into the master branch? This patch may be need for qemu-5.2 > > This code has been like this since 2018, so this is not > a regression in 5.2. At this point in the release cycle > (rc3 imminent) I think it's best to just leave it until 6.0. > OK, I see. Thanks Alex From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA806C2D0E4 for ; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 01:20:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7EE4B20665 for ; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 01:20:44 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 7EE4B20665 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:57332 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1khjUB-0005ck-GK for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 20:20:43 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54524) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1khjR3-00040S-0k; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 20:17:29 -0500 Received: from szxga05-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.191]:2463) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1khjR0-0001vd-7k; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 20:17:28 -0500 Received: from DGGEMS401-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.60]) by szxga05-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4CgjfD4b7jzLtl0; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 09:16:52 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.174.187.138] (10.174.187.138) by DGGEMS401-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.201) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.487.0; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 09:17:11 +0800 Message-ID: <5FBDB096.3040600@huawei.com> Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2020 09:17:10 +0800 From: Alex Chen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Maydell Subject: Re: [PATCH] contrib/rdmacm-mux: Fix error condition in hash_tbl_search_fd_by_ifid() References: <5F9AC6FF.4000301@huawei.com> <5FBCF8F0.9060103@huawei.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: [10.174.187.138] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Received-SPF: pass client-ip=45.249.212.191; envelope-from=alex.chen@huawei.com; helo=szxga05-in.huawei.com X-Spam_score_int: -41 X-Spam_score: -4.2 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: zhanghailiang , QEMU Trivial , Michael Tokarev , QEMU , Yuval Shaia , zhengchuan@huawei.com, Laurent Vivier Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On 2020/11/24 23:29, Peter Maydell wrote: > On Tue, 24 Nov 2020 at 12:15, Alex Chen wrote: >> >> Hi everyone， >> >> Who can help me merge this patch into the master branch? This patch may be need for qemu-5.2 > > This code has been like this since 2018, so this is not > a regression in 5.2. At this point in the release cycle > (rc3 imminent) I think it's best to just leave it until 6.0. > OK, I see. Thanks Alex