From: yangx.jy <yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: [LTP] [RFC PATCH 2/2] include/tst_test_macros.h: Report TINFO when TST_EXP_FD() succeeded
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2021 22:39:00 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5FF47A04.4030908@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <X/Rre6xb0cAg1Emw@yuki.lan>
On 2021/1/5 21:36, Cyril Hrubis wrote:
> Hi!
>> In Summary output, avoid counting the double passed for one test:
>> -------------------------------------
>> ./open01
>> tst_test.c:1261: TINFO: Timeout per run is 0h 05m 00s
>> open01.c:48: TPASS: open() with sticky bit returned fd 3
>> open01.c:59: TPASS: sticky bit is set as expected
>> open01.c:48: TPASS: open() with sirectory bit returned fd 3
>> open01.c:59: TPASS: sirectory bit is set as expected
>>
>> Summary:
>> passed 4
>> failed 0
>> broken 0
>> skipped 0
>> warnings 0
>> -------------------------------------
> What exactly is the problem of having TPASS generated for each open()
> that produces a valid file descriptor in the open testcases?
>
> These macros are especially tailored to generate TPASS/TFAIL messages so
> that the caller does not have to. So even if having two TPASS per run()
> function in open01 was a problem, which I do not think is the case, we
> should just use SAFE_OPEN() there instead.
Hi Cyril,
I perfer to report one TPASS message when finishing one subtest instead
of one step.
because of two reasons:
a) It seems clearer for user to know how many subtests were run
sucessfully.
b) There are too many TPASS/TFAIL messages when a testcase(e.g.
open11) contains many subtests or multiple TST_EXP_* macros.
Could we make TST_EXP_* macros do common check and generate only TFAIL
messages? (Make testcases report TPASS message by themself)
Best Regards,
Xiao Yang
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-05 14:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-04 12:54 [LTP] [PATCH 1/2] syscalls/open01.c: Don't continue when open() failed Xiao Yang
2021-01-04 12:54 ` [LTP] [RFC PATCH 2/2] include/tst_test_macros.h: Report TINFO when TST_EXP_FD() succeeded Xiao Yang
2021-01-04 13:07 ` yangx.jy
2021-01-05 13:38 ` Cyril Hrubis
2021-01-05 13:36 ` Cyril Hrubis
2021-01-05 14:39 ` yangx.jy [this message]
2021-01-05 15:03 ` Cyril Hrubis
2021-01-10 13:04 ` [LTP] [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] include/tst_test_macros.h: Add TST_EXP_SILENT_{PASS, FD} macros Xiao Yang
2021-01-10 13:04 ` [LTP] [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] syscalls/access02.c: Take use of TST_EXP_SILENT_PASS Xiao Yang
2021-01-11 14:07 ` [LTP] [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] include/tst_test_macros.h: Add TST_EXP_SILENT_{PASS, FD} macros Cyril Hrubis
2021-01-10 13:48 ` [LTP] [RFC PATCH 2/2] include/tst_test_macros.h: Report TINFO when TST_EXP_FD() succeeded yangx.jy
2021-01-05 13:15 ` [LTP] [PATCH 1/2] syscalls/open01.c: Don't continue when open() failed Cyril Hrubis
2021-01-05 14:20 ` yangx.jy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5FF47A04.4030908@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.