From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: studdugie <studdugie@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Linux and Plan-9ness
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2005 13:18:32 -0400
Message-ID: <5a59ce5305070410182b2f2eec@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20050630100119.GO11013@nysv.org>
	 <200506301246.PAA29464@raad.intranet>
Reply-To: studdugie <studdugie@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-24944-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
In-Reply-To: <200506301246.PAA29464@raad.intranet>
Content-Disposition: inline
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ReiserFS List <reiserfs-list@namesys.com>

If you dropped the "Unixness" you would have to rename. Maybe Linine,
or  Linsoft, or ....

Think of all the chaos that would cause. You don't want chaos do you?
I mean really, do u want to force all the
\w*(?ilinux)\w*(\.(com|org|net))? sites and publications to rename
too? Unconscionable!

On 6/30/05, Al Boldi <a1426z@gawab.com> wrote:
> Markus   T=F6rnqvist wrote: {
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 10:56:36PM +0200, David Weinehall wrote:
> >instead of trying to get a monstrosity (albeit a very cool one,
> >conceptually) into the kernel.  Sure, it could be made to work, but not
> >without dropping our Unixness.  And if we do, we should start by
> >looking at Plan 9 =3D)
>=20
> What's wrong with "dropping our Unixness" if it means taking an extra ste=
p
> toward Plan 9?
>=20
> Why is this a bad idea?
> }
>=20
> Please explain!
>=20
>