All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Madadi Vineeth Reddy <vineethr@linux.ibm.com>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
	dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, vschneid@redhat.com,
	dhaval@gianis.ca, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Madadi Vineeth Reddy <vineethr@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] sched/fair: Limit run to parity to the min slice of enqueued entities
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2025 12:29:59 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5bbe61ee-d384-47b9-b6f2-c9f607f00156@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250708165630.1948751-5-vincent.guittot@linaro.org>

Hi Vincent,

On 08/07/25 22:26, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> Run to parity ensures that current will get a chance to run its full
> slice in one go but this can create large latency and/or lag for
> entities with shorter slice that have exhausted their previous slice
> and wait to run their next slice.
> 
> Clamp the run to parity to the shortest slice of all enqueued entities.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
> ---
>  kernel/sched/fair.c | 12 ++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 7e82b357763a..85238f2e026a 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -884,16 +884,20 @@ struct sched_entity *__pick_first_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
>  /*
>   * Set the vruntime up to which an entity can run before looking
>   * for another entity to pick.
> - * In case of run to parity, we protect the entity up to its deadline.
> + * In case of run to parity, we use the shortest slice of the enqueued
> + * entities to set the protected period.
>   * When run to parity is disabled, we give a minimum quantum to the running
>   * entity to ensure progress.
>   */

If I set my task’s custom slice to a larger value but another task has a smaller slice,
this change will cap my protected window to the smaller slice. Does that mean my custom
slice is no longer honored?

Thanks,
Madadi Vineeth Reddy

>  static inline void set_protect_slice(struct sched_entity *se)
>  {
> -	u64 quantum = se->slice;
> +	u64 quantum;
>  
> -	if (!sched_feat(RUN_TO_PARITY))
> -		quantum = min(quantum, normalized_sysctl_sched_base_slice);
> +	if (sched_feat(RUN_TO_PARITY))
> +		quantum = cfs_rq_min_slice(cfs_rq_of(se));
> +	else
> +		quantum = normalized_sysctl_sched_base_slice;
> +	quantum = min(quantum, se->slice);
>  
>  	if (quantum != se->slice)
>  		se->vprot = min_vruntime(se->deadline, se->vruntime + calc_delta_fair(quantum, se));


  reply	other threads:[~2025-07-10  7:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-08 16:56 [PATCH v3 0/6] sched/fair: Manage lag and run to parity with different slices Vincent Guittot
2025-07-08 16:56 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] sched/fair: Use protect_slice() instead of direct comparison Vincent Guittot
2025-07-10 12:46   ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Vincent Guittot
2025-07-08 16:56 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] sched/fair: Fix NO_RUN_TO_PARITY case Vincent Guittot
2025-07-09  9:17   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-07-09  9:32     ` Vincent Guittot
2025-07-10 12:46   ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Vincent Guittot
2025-07-08 16:56 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] sched/fair: Remove spurious shorter slice preemption Vincent Guittot
2025-07-10 12:46   ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Vincent Guittot
2025-07-08 16:56 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] sched/fair: Limit run to parity to the min slice of enqueued entities Vincent Guittot
2025-07-10  6:59   ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy [this message]
2025-07-10 10:40     ` Vincent Guittot
2025-07-10 12:34       ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-07-13 18:17         ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2025-07-20 10:57           ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2025-07-21  9:11             ` Vincent Guittot
2025-07-21 15:22               ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2025-07-21  9:06           ` Vincent Guittot
2025-07-10 12:46   ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Vincent Guittot
2025-07-08 16:56 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] sched/fair: Fix entity's lag with run to parity Vincent Guittot
2025-07-10 12:46   ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Vincent Guittot
2025-07-08 16:56 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] sched/fair: Always trigger resched at the end of a protected period Vincent Guittot
2025-07-10 12:46   ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Vincent Guittot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5bbe61ee-d384-47b9-b6f2-c9f607f00156@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=vineethr@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=dhaval@gianis.ca \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.