From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leandro Melo de Sales Subject: Nat types implemented by IPTABLES - STUN issue Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 16:28:42 -0300 Message-ID: <5bc4c45705010511286ee56a0d@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: Leandro Melo de Sales Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: To: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Hi folks, I'm using an implementation for STUN (RFC 3489: http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc3489.html) written in JAVA (http://stun4j.dev.java.net/). In this RFC, they describes some nats variations (see STUN RFC chapter 5) some of them supported by STUN specification, like: Full Cone, Restricted Cone, Port Restricted Cone and Symmetric. So, I have a simple question for iptables developers: what types of nat iptables supports? Thank you in advanced... Leandro.