From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leandro Melo de Sales Subject: Re: Nat types implemented by IPTABLES - STUN issue Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 03:08:20 -0300 Message-ID: <5bc4c45705010522084d524973@mail.gmail.com> References: <5bc4c45705010511286ee56a0d@mail.gmail.com> <876ef97a05010517193799cae6@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: Leandro Melo de Sales Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: To: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org In-Reply-To: <876ef97a05010517193799cae6@mail.gmail.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Hi.... So, I can't understand. The STUN RFC says that STUN doesn't support Symmetric nat. I'm behind a iptables firewall with nat for UDP packets and I can run some tests successfully. Are you sure that iptables just cover symmetric nat? If yes, I really need to check that situation. Leandro. On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 20:19:43 -0500, Tobias DiPasquale wrote: > On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 16:28:42 -0300, Leandro Melo de Sales > wrote: > > I'm using an implementation for STUN (RFC 3489: > > http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc3489.html) written in JAVA > > (http://stun4j.dev.java.net/). > > In this RFC, they describes some nats variations (see STUN RFC > > chapter 5) some of them supported by STUN specification, like: Full > > Cone, Restricted Cone, Port Restricted Cone and Symmetric. > > So, I have a simple question for iptables developers: what types of > > nat iptables supports? > > Symmetric only. > > -- > [ Tobias DiPasquale ] > 0x636f6465736c696e67657240676d61696c2e636f6d >