From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCJUQbKEIgTGVhbmRybyBTYWxlcw==?=" Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 23:51:12 +0000 Subject: Re: Towards the ccid-3 and ccid-4 integration Message-Id: <5bc4c4570709261651t29d2c7f2u98c98fb068af0c97@mail.gmail.com> List-Id: References: <5bc4c4570709241115u1254baa9j7033d1bdc9dc079@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5bc4c4570709241115u1254baa9j7033d1bdc9dc079@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: dccp@vger.kernel.org 2007/9/25, Gerrit Renker : > Sorry for the delay there were local bank holidays here. > > | - Rewrite all the patches (from me and Tommi) and resubmit to Gerrit > | as a unique patchset, as suggested by Ian. Besides, ask Gerrit to > | overwrite the current ccid4 branch; > | - Identify and provide common code between ccid-4 and ccid-3. > | 1 - minor functions from ccid-3.c to ccid-3.h and include it (.h) in > | the ccid-4.c, as suggested by Ian and Arnaldo > | 2 - for more complex functions, write a dccp_ccid3_lib.ko, as > | suggested by arnaldo > The ideas sound good, and I think it is a good idea to factor out what is > not needed - just unclear which patch set to use, the latest so far is from > Thursday? > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dccp" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Hi, Gerrit, the latest so far is from Friday, the mine, which it was similar to the Tommi patch, so then I just patches the differences between the mine and the tommi's patchset. But I'm put all the patches together (the mine and tommi as one patchset and I will ask you to overwrite the current ccid4 branch. Besides, I'm going through the ideas of dccp_ccid3_lib.ko. Leandro.