From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PULL_REQUEST, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9BE4C4CECE for ; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 12:19:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6965E206A3 for ; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 12:19:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="GJjYHRer"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=agner.ch header.i=@agner.ch header.b="ICSX39UL" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 6965E206A3 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=agner.ch Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Subject:To:From:Date:MIME-Version:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=QCgrIvQ0JF08QLcUVOoPPsL1Pf+wSXhlz6r8P8Y/r3w=; b=GJjYHRersk/vXx +6u+zKFzyJeRpmSLFbTRyIggc/oB3IJfu+i8Qmvp5fBCc5W99I+01fcL8XoJrDBUcSctPsM2IgQa1 wrj3rMZNmcO3SJYuSxW1qGR6Ont6vbFLRTyE0c5p6aNyjCVM1/Ipl5n8FT3N1Ym/qkP/1cfdYnje6 PbxYBa2CH88clTfn5g91gj5wzTvi3qESpiCtVWCXjcg8TOMppG7v8vnOG1DqAkEO82Go5f4f9D+sT U516d95RJCs5lEa6JfBN0nXwMlZq67jlSo1/8qwkfBlwosqAI3rRs47AQkk8jBuauQx2LZLSXidd/ /N/qjRcTGloEp+GsPplQ==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1iJzJT-00021n-JN; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 12:18:59 +0000 Received: from mail.kmu-office.ch ([2a02:418:6a02::a2]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1iJzJM-0001tC-KD for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 12:18:54 +0000 Received: from webmail.kmu-office.ch (unknown [IPv6:2a02:418:6a02::a3]) by mail.kmu-office.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A4F045C2968; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 14:18:49 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=agner.ch; s=dkim; t=1571055529; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=tUWv412VQZoopHuE7ztnTjIoClPeJVLNjINpNM1w6tQ=; b=ICSX39ULtQj93XvVsHqiB7OVjkLRxa4bKwgeMKr/M27rNwkra7L+kB9Sliyu5WDABWWSvk nNzFXBcr9cwX1shgdpuGGxuY/z2vuFTCWiq5/FXTzZDthoDsk3IuYLzZDSWTJAVTiOzygc c0lYV+GsdzjV6XBgASWggdXY7lgTI98= MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 14:18:49 +0200 From: Stefan Agner To: Guenter Roeck , Thierry Reding Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] ARM/arm64: arm_pm_restart removal In-Reply-To: References: <20191002131228.4085560-1-thierry.reding@gmail.com> <20191002160151.GS25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> Message-ID: <5bf4d9e5b2fa67533c190567498a5b0b@agner.ch> X-Sender: stefan@agner.ch User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.3.9 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20191014_051852_986577_1A965F1D X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 23.97 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Olof Johansson , ARM-SoC Maintainers , Russell King - ARM Linux admin , Linux ARM Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 2019-10-03 15:15, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 10/2/19 11:46 AM, Olof Johansson wrote: >> It looks like it's an old patchset that you were cc:d on at the time, >> but I can't blame anyone for missing context here. >> >> Thierry, a reference to the thread would have been useful: >> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20170130110512.6943-1-thierry.reding@gmail.com/ >> >> Given that the code is 2.5 years old, posting it again for awareness >> seems appropriate, even if it was acked by a few stakeholders >> originally. >> > > Thierry, > > would you mind doing that ? > > To give some background: I had completely forgotten about this, until I recently > hit a problem with restart that was difficult to debug since it was > hard to figure > out which reset sequence was actually executed. I thought about re-posting the > series, but then we (ie those who cared enough to be involved in above > referenced > exchange) decided to use this approach. Now I still wonder what it will take > to get the series applied. > > At least posting the series as pull request did generate some attention. > I count that as an improvement. By chance I just sent a patch which moves to restart handler for PSCI this weekend [1]. So this patch set is very much appreciated. -- Stefan [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20191012214735.1127009-1-stefan@agner.ch/T/#u > > Guenter > >> >> -Olof >> >> On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 9:01 AM Russell King - ARM Linux admin >> wrote: >>> >>> Why was I not copied on these changes (which clearly touch core ARM >>> code) both the patch series and this pull request? >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 03:12:28PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: >>>> Hi ARM SoC maintainers, >>>> >>>> The following changes since commit 54ecb8f7028c5eb3d740bb82b0f1d90f2df63c5c: >>>> >>>> Linux 5.4-rc1 (2019-09-30 10:35:40 -0700) >>>> >>>> are available in the Git repository at: >>>> >>>> https://github.com/thierryreding/linux.git tags/for-5.5/arm-pm-restart-removal >>>> >>>> for you to fetch changes up to 81b3f28283e2f0b03cea2127e9ff78e7c505b3d3: >>>> >>>> ARM: Remove arm_pm_restart() (2019-10-02 14:56:22 +0200) >>>> >>>> This is the set of changes that we recently discussed that remove all >>>> uses of the arm_pm_restart symbol and replaces it by usages of the new >>>> restart handler that Guenter had introduced. >>>> >>>> I've rebased these on top of v5.4-rc1. >>>> >>>> Thierry >>>> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> ARM/arm64: arm_pm_restart removal >>>> >>>> This set of patches converts all remaining users of the arm_pm_restart >>>> mechanism for installing reboot hooks to the restart handler mechanism >>>> and finally removes the arm_pm_restart symbol. >>>> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> Guenter Roeck (6): >>>> ARM: prima2: Register with kernel restart handler >>>> ARM: xen: Register with kernel restart handler >>>> drivers: firmware: psci: Register with kernel restart handler >>>> ARM: Register with kernel restart handler >>>> ARM64: Remove arm_pm_restart() >>>> ARM: Remove arm_pm_restart() >>>> >>>> arch/arm/include/asm/system_misc.h | 1 - >>>> arch/arm/kernel/reboot.c | 6 +----- >>>> arch/arm/kernel/setup.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++-- >>>> arch/arm/mach-prima2/rstc.c | 11 +++++++++-- >>>> arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c | 12 ++++++++++-- >>>> arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h | 2 -- >>>> arch/arm64/kernel/process.c | 7 +------ >>>> drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c | 12 ++++++++++-- >>>> 8 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ >>> FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up >>> According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up >> > > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel