From: Anton Eliasson <anton.eliasson@axis.com>
To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@inria.fr>
Cc: Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@imag.fr>,
cocci@inria.fr, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@axis.com
Subject: Re: [cocci] [PATCH 2/2] scripts: coccicheck: Separate spatch stdout and stderr
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2023 17:59:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5c76da14-e34e-afbd-4265-493c66e0bc60@axis.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2310072140340.36842@hadrien>
On 07/10/2023 21.41, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
> On Tue, 3 Oct 2023, Anton Eliasson wrote:
>
>> This helps automating coccicheck runs by discarding stderr and only
>> looking at the output of stdout. In report mode the only remaining
>> output on stdout is the initial "Please check for false positives"
>> message followed by each spatch warning found.
> What is getting dropped is the spatch command lines indicating the
> semantic patch. Is this desirable?
>
> julia
It's not ideal but it's the best compromise that I have found. The
problem I'm trying to solve is to be able to diff the output of two
coccicheck runs and notify the developer if any new warnings were
introduced. That requires the output to be stable. spatch is always
invoked for each cocci file in the same order. However, the output from
each spatch invocation is not stable as it examines each source file in
an arbitrary order.
My workaround is to sort the output before diffing. The line-by-line
sorted output only makes sense if the input is one line per warning
found and that is why I try to discard all output except the single line
per spatch warning. While the terse output doesn't tell which semantic
patch file generated the warning, it does usually contain the offending
file, line number and a summary of the issue.
Anton
>
>> Signed-off-by: Anton Eliasson <anton.eliasson@axis.com>
>> ---
>> scripts/coccicheck | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/scripts/coccicheck b/scripts/coccicheck
>> index 95a312730e98..7e7c44125f47 100755
>> --- a/scripts/coccicheck
>> +++ b/scripts/coccicheck
>> @@ -146,8 +146,8 @@ run_cmd_parmap() {
>> echo $@>>$DEBUG_FILE
>> $@ 2>>$DEBUG_FILE
>> else
>> - echo $@
>> - $@ 2>&1
>> + echo $@ >&2
>> + $@
>> fi
>>
>> err=$?
>>
>> --
>> 2.30.2
>>
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-11 13:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-03 14:25 [cocci] [PATCH 0/2] coccicheck bugfix and CI improvement Anton Eliasson
2023-10-03 14:25 ` Anton Eliasson
2023-10-03 14:25 ` [cocci] [PATCH 1/2] scripts: coccicheck: Return error from run_cmd_parmap Anton Eliasson
2023-10-03 14:25 ` Anton Eliasson
2023-11-02 21:27 ` [cocci] " Julia Lawall
2023-11-17 16:36 ` Anton Eliasson
2023-10-03 14:25 ` [cocci] [PATCH 2/2] scripts: coccicheck: Separate spatch stdout and stderr Anton Eliasson
2023-10-03 14:25 ` Anton Eliasson
2023-10-07 19:41 ` [cocci] " Julia Lawall
2023-10-10 15:59 ` Anton Eliasson [this message]
2023-10-10 16:11 ` Julia Lawall
2023-10-11 13:19 ` Anton Eliasson
2023-10-11 13:46 ` Julia Lawall
2023-10-11 13:57 ` Anton Eliasson
2023-10-12 7:30 ` [cocci] Detecting differences according to source code analysis warnings Markus Elfring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5c76da14-e34e-afbd-4265-493c66e0bc60@axis.com \
--to=anton.eliasson@axis.com \
--cc=cocci@inria.fr \
--cc=julia.lawall@inria.fr \
--cc=kernel@axis.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.palix@imag.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.