From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "curby ." Subject: Re: dnatting Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 09:49:12 -0600 Message-ID: <5d2f3791050714084935dc1d83@mail.gmail.com> References: <20050711151830.GA26670@tranquility.scriptkitchen.com> <5d2f379105071408426a506986@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: "curby ." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5d2f379105071408426a506986@mail.gmail.com> Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Netfilter ML On 7/14/05, curby . wrote: [snip] > See here for implementation details: > http://netfilter.org/documentation/HOWTO//NAT-HOWTO-10.html Boy, how embarassing. This has already been discussed to death. =3DP Re: DNAT+SNAT vs DNS: depends on your network. It's been mentioned that some people don't even have a DNS server...