From: Robert Hoo <robert.hu@linux.intel.com>
To: pbonzini@redhat.com, richard.henderson@linaro.org, ehabkost@redhat.com
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] i386/cpu_dump: support AVX512 ZMM regs dump
Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2021 10:36:53 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5d31c441a2318c6dd969da8ddcff81e083c48e80.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c31c1d0033d1cdf7aee6dc20cb3c4c27ec754222.camel@linux.intel.com>
Hi,
Ping...
Thanks
On Fri, 2021-03-26 at 23:01 +0800, Robert Hoo wrote:
> On Fri, 2021-03-26 at 22:54 +0800, Robert Hoo wrote:
> > Since commit fa4518741e (target-i386: Rename struct XMMReg to
> > ZMMReg),
> > CPUX86State.xmm_regs[] has already been extended to 512bit to
> > support
> > AVX512.
> > Also, other qemu level supports for AVX512 registers are there for
> > years.
> > But in x86_cpu_dump_state(), still only dump XMM registers no
> > matter
> > YMM/ZMM is enabled.
> > This patch is to complement this, let it dump XMM/YMM/ZMM
> > accordingly.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Robert Hoo <robert.hu@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > Changelog:
> > v4: stringent AVX512 case and AVX case judgement criteria
> > v3: fix some coding style issue.
> > v2: dump XMM/YMM/ZMM according to XSAVE state-components
> > enablement.
> >
> > target/i386/cpu-dump.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > ------------
> > 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/target/i386/cpu-dump.c b/target/i386/cpu-dump.c
> > index aac21f1..dea4564 100644
> > --- a/target/i386/cpu-dump.c
> > +++ b/target/i386/cpu-dump.c
> > @@ -478,6 +478,11 @@ void x86_cpu_dump_state(CPUState *cs, FILE *f,
> > int flags)
> > qemu_fprintf(f, "EFER=%016" PRIx64 "\n", env->efer);
> > if (flags & CPU_DUMP_FPU) {
> > int fptag;
> > + const uint64_t avx512_mask = XSTATE_OPMASK_MASK | \
> > + XSTATE_ZMM_Hi256_MASK | \
> > + XSTATE_Hi16_ZMM_MASK | \
> > + XSTATE_YMM_MASK |
> > XSTATE_SSE_MASK,
> > + avx_mask = XSTATE_YMM_MASK |
> > XSTATE_SSE_MASK;
> > fptag = 0;
> > for(i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
> > fptag |= ((!env->fptags[i]) << i);
> > @@ -499,21 +504,48 @@ void x86_cpu_dump_state(CPUState *cs, FILE
> > *f,
> > int flags)
> > else
> > qemu_fprintf(f, " ");
> > }
> > - if (env->hflags & HF_CS64_MASK)
> > - nb = 16;
> > - else
> > - nb = 8;
> > - for(i=0;i<nb;i++) {
> > - qemu_fprintf(f, "XMM%02d=%08x%08x%08x%08x",
> > - i,
> > - env->xmm_regs[i].ZMM_L(3),
> > - env->xmm_regs[i].ZMM_L(2),
> > - env->xmm_regs[i].ZMM_L(1),
> > - env->xmm_regs[i].ZMM_L(0));
> > - if ((i & 1) == 1)
> > - qemu_fprintf(f, "\n");
> > - else
> > - qemu_fprintf(f, " ");
> > +
> > + if ((env->xcr0 & avx512_mask) == avx512_mask) {
> > + /* XSAVE enabled AVX512 */
> > + for (i = 0; i < NB_OPMASK_REGS; i++) {
> > + qemu_fprintf(f, "Opmask%02d=%016lx%s", i, env-
> > > opmask_regs[i],
> >
> > + ((i & 3) == 3) ? "\n" : " ");
> > + }
> > +
> > + nb = (env->hflags & HF_CS64_MASK) ? 32 : 8;
> > + for (i = 0; i < nb; i++) {
> > + qemu_fprintf(f, "ZMM%02d=%016lx %016lx %016lx
> > %016lx
> > %016lx "
> > + "%016lx %016lx %016lx\n",
> > + i,
> > + env->xmm_regs[i].ZMM_Q(7),
> > + env->xmm_regs[i].ZMM_Q(6),
> > + env->xmm_regs[i].ZMM_Q(5),
> > + env->xmm_regs[i].ZMM_Q(4),
> > + env->xmm_regs[i].ZMM_Q(3),
> > + env->xmm_regs[i].ZMM_Q(2),
> > + env->xmm_regs[i].ZMM_Q(1),
> > + env->xmm_regs[i].ZMM_Q(0));
> > + }
> > + } else if (env->xcr0 & avx_mask) {
>
> Here should be
> else if ((env->xcr0 & avx_mask) == avx_mask)
>
> Sorry about my sleepy head.
>
> > + /* XSAVE enabled AVX */
> > + nb = env->hflags & HF_CS64_MASK ? 16 : 8;
> > + for (i = 0; i < nb; i++) {
> > + qemu_fprintf(f, "YMM%02d=%016lx %016lx %016lx
> > %016lx\n",
> > + i,
> > + env->xmm_regs[i].ZMM_Q(3),
> > + env->xmm_regs[i].ZMM_Q(2),
> > + env->xmm_regs[i].ZMM_Q(1),
> > + env->xmm_regs[i].ZMM_Q(0));
> > + }
> > + } else { /* SSE and below cases */
> > + nb = env->hflags & HF_CS64_MASK ? 16 : 8;
> > + for (i = 0; i < nb; i++) {
> > + qemu_fprintf(f, "XMM%02d=%016lx %016lx%s",
> > + i,
> > + env->xmm_regs[i].ZMM_Q(1),
> > + env->xmm_regs[i].ZMM_Q(0),
> > + (i & 1) ? "\n" : " ");
> > + }
> > }
> > }
> > if (flags & CPU_DUMP_CODE) {
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-06 2:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-26 14:54 [PATCH v4] i386/cpu_dump: support AVX512 ZMM regs dump Robert Hoo
2021-03-26 15:01 ` Robert Hoo
2021-04-06 2:36 ` Robert Hoo [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5d31c441a2318c6dd969da8ddcff81e083c48e80.camel@linux.intel.com \
--to=robert.hu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.