From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/11] drm/i915: Compute the global scheduler caps
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 07:45:47 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5d49eaef-e4ac-f9b9-d589-c7e64def77e3@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190226102404.29153-7-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
On 26/02/2019 10:24, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Do a pass over all the engines upon starting to determine the global
> scheduler capability flags (those that are agreed upon by all).
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 2 ++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 6 ----
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h | 2 ++
> 4 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> index 713ed6fbdcc8..f6fe10fce0ec 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> @@ -4700,6 +4700,8 @@ static int __i915_gem_restart_engines(void *data)
> }
> }
>
> + intel_engines_set_scheduler_caps(i915);
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c
> index b7b626195eda..ef49b1b0537b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c
> @@ -608,6 +608,45 @@ int intel_engine_setup_common(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> return err;
> }
>
> +void intel_engines_set_scheduler_caps(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> +{
> + static const struct {
> + u8 engine;
> + u8 sched;
> + } map[] = {
> +#define MAP(x, y) { ilog2(I915_ENGINE_HAS_##x), ilog2(I915_SCHEDULER_CAP_##y) }
> + MAP(PREEMPTION, PREEMPTION),
> +#undef MAP
> + };
> + struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
> + enum intel_engine_id id;
> + u32 enabled, disabled;
> +
> + enabled = 0;
> + disabled = 0;
> + for_each_engine(engine, i915, id) { /* all engines must agree! */
> + int i;
> +
> + if (engine->schedule)
> + enabled |= (I915_SCHEDULER_CAP_ENABLED |
> + I915_SCHEDULER_CAP_PRIORITY);
> + else
> + disabled |= (I915_SCHEDULER_CAP_ENABLED |
> + I915_SCHEDULER_CAP_PRIORITY);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(map); i++) {
> + if (engine->flags & BIT(map[i].engine))
> + enabled |= BIT(map[i].sched);
> + else
> + disabled |= BIT(map[i].sched);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + i915->caps.scheduler = enabled & ~disabled;
> + if (!(i915->caps.scheduler & I915_SCHEDULER_CAP_ENABLED))
> + i915->caps.scheduler = 0;
> +}
> +
> static void __intel_context_unpin(struct i915_gem_context *ctx,
> struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> index 29b2a2f34edb..f57cfe2fc078 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> @@ -2327,12 +2327,6 @@ void intel_execlists_set_default_submission(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> engine->flags |= I915_ENGINE_SUPPORTS_STATS;
> if (engine->i915->preempt_context)
> engine->flags |= I915_ENGINE_HAS_PREEMPTION;
> -
> - engine->i915->caps.scheduler =
> - I915_SCHEDULER_CAP_ENABLED |
> - I915_SCHEDULER_CAP_PRIORITY;
> - if (intel_engine_has_preemption(engine))
> - engine->i915->caps.scheduler |= I915_SCHEDULER_CAP_PREEMPTION;
> }
>
> static void
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
> index 5284f243931a..b8ec7e40a59b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
> @@ -576,6 +576,8 @@ intel_engine_has_preemption(const struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> return engine->flags & I915_ENGINE_HAS_PREEMPTION;
> }
>
> +void intel_engines_set_scheduler_caps(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
> +
> static inline bool __execlists_need_preempt(int prio, int last)
> {
> /*
>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-28 7:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-26 10:23 [PATCH 01/11] drm/i915: Skip scanning for signalers if we are already inflight Chris Wilson
2019-02-26 10:23 ` [PATCH 02/11] drm/i915/execlists: Suppress mere WAIT preemption Chris Wilson
2019-02-28 12:33 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-02-26 10:23 ` [PATCH 03/11] drm/i915/execlists: Suppress redundant preemption Chris Wilson
2019-02-28 13:11 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-03-01 11:31 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-03-01 11:36 ` Chris Wilson
2019-03-01 15:07 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-03-01 15:14 ` Chris Wilson
2019-02-26 10:23 ` [PATCH 04/11] drm/i915: Make request allocation caches global Chris Wilson
2019-02-27 10:29 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-02-27 10:44 ` Chris Wilson
2019-02-27 14:17 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-02-27 14:43 ` Chris Wilson
2019-02-26 10:23 ` [PATCH 05/11] drm/i915: Introduce i915_timeline.mutex Chris Wilson
2019-02-28 7:43 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-02-28 8:09 ` Chris Wilson
2019-02-26 10:23 ` [PATCH 06/11] drm/i915: Keep timeline HWSP allocated until idle across the system Chris Wilson
2019-02-27 10:44 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-02-27 10:51 ` Chris Wilson
2019-02-27 11:15 ` [PATCH] " Chris Wilson
2019-02-27 14:20 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-02-26 10:24 ` [PATCH 07/11] drm/i915: Compute the global scheduler caps Chris Wilson
2019-02-28 7:45 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2019-02-26 10:24 ` [PATCH 08/11] drm/i915: Use HW semaphores for inter-engine synchronisation on gen8+ Chris Wilson
2019-02-28 10:49 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-02-26 10:24 ` [PATCH 09/11] drm/i915: Prioritise non-busywait semaphore workloads Chris Wilson
2019-02-26 10:24 ` [PATCH 10/11] drm/i915/execlists: Skip direct submission if only lite-restore Chris Wilson
2019-02-28 13:20 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-03-01 10:22 ` Chris Wilson
2019-03-01 10:27 ` Chris Wilson
2019-02-26 10:24 ` [PATCH 11/11] drm/i915: Use __ffs() in for_each_priolist for more compact code Chris Wilson
2019-02-28 7:42 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-02-26 10:56 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [01/11] drm/i915: Skip scanning for signalers if we are already inflight Patchwork
2019-02-26 11:26 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [01/11] drm/i915: Skip scanning for signalers if we are already inflight (rev2) Patchwork
2019-02-26 11:31 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2019-02-26 11:51 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2019-02-26 15:17 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2019-02-27 10:19 ` [PATCH 01/11] drm/i915: Skip scanning for signalers if we are already inflight Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-02-27 11:38 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [01/11] drm/i915: Skip scanning for signalers if we are already inflight (rev3) Patchwork
2019-02-27 11:42 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2019-02-27 12:03 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2019-02-27 13:58 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5d49eaef-e4ac-f9b9-d589-c7e64def77e3@linux.intel.com \
--to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.