Re: [PATCH v2] tools/arm: Fix nr_spis handling v2

["Orzel, Michal" <michal.orzel@amd.com>]

On 26/03/2025 15:47, Anthony PERARD wrote:
> 
> 
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 12:00:29PM +0100, Michal Orzel wrote:
>> diff --git a/tools/libs/light/libxl_arm.c b/tools/libs/light/libxl_arm.c
>> index 2d895408cac3..0adcaa373b54 100644
>> --- a/tools/libs/light/libxl_arm.c
>> +++ b/tools/libs/light/libxl_arm.c
>> @@ -181,13 +181,18 @@ int libxl__arch_domain_prepare_config(libxl__gc *gc,
>>
>>      LOG(DEBUG, "Configure the domain");
>>
>> -    if (nr_spis > d_config->b_info.arch_arm.nr_spis) {
>> -        LOG(ERROR, "Provided nr_spis value is too small (minimum required %u)\n",
>> -            nr_spis);
>> -        return ERROR_FAIL;
>> +    /* Check if a user provided a value or not */
>> +    if (cfg_nr_spis != LIBXL_NR_SPIS_DEFAULT) {
>> +        if (nr_spis > cfg_nr_spis) {
>> +            LOG(ERROR, "Provided nr_spis value is too small (minimum required %u)\n",
>> +                nr_spis);
>> +            return ERROR_FAIL;
>> +        }
>> +        config->arch.nr_spis = cfg_nr_spis;
>>      }
>> +    else
>> +        config->arch.nr_spis = nr_spis;
> 
> Just one small coding style issue: to avoid confusion, whenever one side
> a of an if..else is using a block, both side should use a block. But
Oh, I should have checked with tools/libs/light/CODING_STYLE.

> that can be fixed on commit:
> Reviewed-by: Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@vates.tech>
Fixing on commit would be great.

~Michal