All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hao Ge <hao.ge@linux.dev>
To: Abhishek Bapat <abhishekbapat@google.com>,
	Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Cc: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Sourav Panda <souravpanda@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] alloc_tag: add size-based filtering to ioctl
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2026 12:09:37 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5d77fadd-13a9-40ed-a8e8-2982ceb69af2@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ef88e52368463e312086a966f10287a29d0edeca.1780701922.git.abhishekbapat@google.com>

Hi Abhishek


Thanks for the new version.


On 2026/6/6 07:36, Abhishek Bapat wrote:
> Extend the allocinfo filtering mechanism to allow users to filter tags
> based on the total number of bytes allocated [min_size, max_size]. The
> size range is inclusive.
>
> Filtering by size involves retrieving allocinfo per-CPU counters, which
> is an expensive operation. Hence, the performance of size-based
> filtering will be worse than other filters.
>
> Signed-off-by: Abhishek Bapat <abhishekbapat@google.com>
> ---
>   include/uapi/linux/alloc_tag.h |  8 +++-
>   lib/alloc_tag.c                | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>   2 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/alloc_tag.h b/include/uapi/linux/alloc_tag.h
> index cffb0c46e0b1..0e648192df4d 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/alloc_tag.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/alloc_tag.h
> @@ -39,13 +39,17 @@ enum {
>   	ALLOCINFO_FILTER_FUNCTION,
>   	ALLOCINFO_FILTER_FILENAME,
>   	ALLOCINFO_FILTER_LINENO,
> -	__ALLOCINFO_FILTER_LAST = ALLOCINFO_FILTER_LINENO
> +	ALLOCINFO_FILTER_MIN_SIZE,
> +	ALLOCINFO_FILTER_MAX_SIZE,
> +	__ALLOCINFO_FILTER_LAST = ALLOCINFO_FILTER_MAX_SIZE
>   };
>   
>   #define ALLOCINFO_FILTER_MASK_MODNAME		(1 << ALLOCINFO_FILTER_MODNAME)
>   #define ALLOCINFO_FILTER_MASK_FUNCTION		(1 << ALLOCINFO_FILTER_FUNCTION)
>   #define ALLOCINFO_FILTER_MASK_FILENAME		(1 << ALLOCINFO_FILTER_FILENAME)
>   #define ALLOCINFO_FILTER_MASK_LINENO		(1 << ALLOCINFO_FILTER_LINENO)
> +#define ALLOCINFO_FILTER_MASK_MIN_SIZE		(1 << ALLOCINFO_FILTER_MIN_SIZE)
> +#define ALLOCINFO_FILTER_MASK_MAX_SIZE		(1 << ALLOCINFO_FILTER_MAX_SIZE)
>   
>   #define ALLOCINFO_FILTER_MASKS \
>   	((1 << (__ALLOCINFO_FILTER_LAST + 1)) - 1)
> @@ -53,6 +57,8 @@ enum {
>   struct allocinfo_filter {
>   	__u64 mask; /* bitmask of the filter fields used */
>   	struct allocinfo_tag fields;
> +	__u64 min_size;
> +	__u64 max_size;
>   };
>   
>   struct allocinfo_get_at {
> diff --git a/lib/alloc_tag.c b/lib/alloc_tag.c
> index 93bc976ac505..ddc6946f56ab 100644
> --- a/lib/alloc_tag.c
> +++ b/lib/alloc_tag.c
> @@ -191,15 +191,26 @@ static int allocinfo_cmp_str(const char *str, const char *template)
>   	return strncmp(allocinfo_str(str), template, ALLOCINFO_STR_SIZE);
>   }
>   
> +/* Fetch the per-CPU counters */
> +static inline struct alloc_tag_counters allocinfo_prefetch_counters(struct codetag *ct)
> +{
> +	return alloc_tag_read(ct_to_alloc_tag(ct));
> +}
> +
>   /*
>    * Populates the UAPI allocinfo_tag_data structure with active runtime
>    * profiling counters extracted from the given kernel codetag.
>    */
>   static void allocinfo_to_params(struct codetag *ct,
> -				struct allocinfo_tag_data *data)
> +				struct allocinfo_tag_data *data,
> +				struct alloc_tag_counters *counters)
>   {
> -	struct alloc_tag *tag = ct_to_alloc_tag(ct);
> -	struct alloc_tag_counters counter = alloc_tag_read(tag);
> +	struct alloc_tag_counters local_counters;
> +
> +	if (!counters) {
> +		local_counters = allocinfo_prefetch_counters(ct);
> +		counters = &local_counters;
> +	}
>   
>   	if (ct->modname)
>   		allocinfo_copy_str(data->tag.modname, ct->modname);
> @@ -208,9 +219,9 @@ static void allocinfo_to_params(struct codetag *ct,
>   	allocinfo_copy_str(data->tag.function, ct->function);
>   	allocinfo_copy_str(data->tag.filename, ct->filename);
>   	data->tag.lineno = ct->lineno;
> -	data->counter.bytes = counter.bytes;
> -	data->counter.calls = counter.calls;
> -	data->counter.accurate = !alloc_tag_is_inaccurate(tag);
> +	data->counter.bytes = counters->bytes;
> +	data->counter.calls = counters->calls;
> +	data->counter.accurate = !alloc_tag_is_inaccurate(ct_to_alloc_tag(ct));
>   }
>   
>   /*
> @@ -234,7 +245,9 @@ static int allocinfo_ioctl_get_content_id(struct seq_file *m, void __user *arg)
>    * Verifies whether a given codetag satisfies the active filtering criteria by
>    * matching it's characteristics against the specified filter.
>    */
> -static bool matches_filter(struct codetag *ct, struct allocinfo_filter *filter)
> +static bool matches_filter(struct codetag *ct, struct allocinfo_filter *filter,
> +			   struct alloc_tag_counters *counters,
> +			   bool *fetched_counters)
>   {
>   	if (!filter || !filter->mask)
>   		return true;
> @@ -247,20 +260,34 @@ static bool matches_filter(struct codetag *ct, struct allocinfo_filter *filter)
>   				return false;
>   		} else if (allocinfo_cmp_str(ct->modname, filter->fields.modname))
>   			return false;
> +		}
It seems an extra } was accidentally added here
>   	}
>   
>   	if ((filter->mask & ALLOCINFO_FILTER_MASK_FUNCTION) &&
> -	    ct->function && (allocinfo_cmp_str(ct->function, filter->fields.function)))
> +	    ct->function && allocinfo_cmp_str(ct->function, filter->fields.function))
>   		return false;
>   
This should be fixed in the second patch; it's unrelated to current 
functionality.
>   	if ((filter->mask & ALLOCINFO_FILTER_MASK_FILENAME) &&
> -	    ct->filename && (allocinfo_cmp_str(ct->filename, filter->fields.filename)))
> +	    ct->filename && allocinfo_cmp_str(ct->filename, filter->fields.filename))
>   		return false;

Ditto


Thanks

Best Regards

Hao

>   	if ((filter->mask & ALLOCINFO_FILTER_MASK_LINENO) &&
>   	    ct->lineno != filter->fields.lineno)
>   		return false;
>   
> +	if (filter->mask & (ALLOCINFO_FILTER_MASK_MIN_SIZE | ALLOCINFO_FILTER_MASK_MAX_SIZE)) {
> +		if (!*fetched_counters) {
> +			*counters = allocinfo_prefetch_counters(ct);
> +			*fetched_counters = true;
> +		}
> +		if ((filter->mask & ALLOCINFO_FILTER_MASK_MIN_SIZE) &&
> +		    counters->bytes < filter->min_size)
> +			return false;
> +		if ((filter->mask & ALLOCINFO_FILTER_MASK_MAX_SIZE) &&
> +		    counters->bytes > filter->max_size)
> +			return false;
> +	}
> +
>   	return true;
>   }
>   
> @@ -274,6 +301,8 @@ static int allocinfo_ioctl_get_at(struct seq_file *m, void __user *arg)
>   	struct codetag *ct;
>   	struct allocinfo_get_at params = {0};
>   	__u64 skip_count;
> +	struct alloc_tag_counters counters;
> +	bool fetched_counters;
>   
>   	if (copy_from_user(&params, arg, sizeof(params)))
>   		return -EFAULT;
> @@ -281,6 +310,11 @@ static int allocinfo_ioctl_get_at(struct seq_file *m, void __user *arg)
>   	if (params.filter.mask & ~ALLOCINFO_FILTER_MASKS)
>   		return -EINVAL;
>   
> +	if ((params.filter.mask & ALLOCINFO_FILTER_MASK_MIN_SIZE) &&
> +	    (params.filter.mask & ALLOCINFO_FILTER_MASK_MAX_SIZE) &&
> +	    params.filter.min_size > params.filter.max_size)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
>   	priv = m->private;
>   
>   	mutex_lock(&priv->ioctl_lock);
> @@ -304,7 +338,8 @@ static int allocinfo_ioctl_get_at(struct seq_file *m, void __user *arg)
>   	ct = codetag_next_ct(&priv->ioctl_iter);
>   
>   	while (ct) {
> -		if (matches_filter(ct, &priv->filter)) {
> +		fetched_counters = false;
> +		if (matches_filter(ct, &priv->filter, &counters, &fetched_counters)) {
>   			if (skip_count == 0)
>   				break;
>   			skip_count--;
> @@ -313,7 +348,7 @@ static int allocinfo_ioctl_get_at(struct seq_file *m, void __user *arg)
>   	}
>   
>   	if (ct) {
> -		allocinfo_to_params(ct, &params.data);
> +		allocinfo_to_params(ct, &params.data, fetched_counters ? &counters : NULL);
>   		priv->positioned = true;
>   	}
>   
> @@ -339,6 +374,8 @@ static int allocinfo_ioctl_get_next(struct seq_file *m, void __user *arg)
>   	struct codetag *ct;
>   	struct allocinfo_tag_data params;
>   	int ret = 0;
> +	struct alloc_tag_counters counters;
> +	bool fetched_counters;
>   
>   	memset(&params, 0, sizeof(params));
>   	priv = m->private;
> @@ -352,10 +389,15 @@ static int allocinfo_ioctl_get_next(struct seq_file *m, void __user *arg)
>   	}
>   
>   	ct = codetag_next_ct(&priv->ioctl_iter);
> -	while (ct && !matches_filter(ct, &priv->filter))
> +	while (ct) {
> +		fetched_counters = false;
> +		if (matches_filter(ct, &priv->filter, &counters, &fetched_counters))
> +			break;
>   		ct = codetag_next_ct(&priv->ioctl_iter);
> +	}
> +
>   	if (ct)
> -		allocinfo_to_params(ct, &params);
> +		allocinfo_to_params(ct, &params, fetched_counters ? &counters : NULL);
>   
>   	if (!ct) {
>   		priv->positioned = false;


  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-08  4:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-05 23:36 [PATCH v3 0/6] alloc_tag: introduce IOCTL-based filtering for MAP Abhishek Bapat
2026-06-05 23:36 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] alloc_tag: add ioctl to /proc/allocinfo Abhishek Bapat
2026-06-08  1:52   ` Hao Ge
2026-06-09  0:19     ` Abhishek Bapat
2026-06-09  1:43       ` Hao Ge
2026-06-05 23:36 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] alloc_tag: add ioctl filters " Abhishek Bapat
2026-06-08  2:39   ` Hao Ge
2026-06-05 23:36 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] alloc_tag: add size-based filtering to ioctl Abhishek Bapat
2026-06-08  4:09   ` Hao Ge [this message]
2026-06-05 23:36 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] alloc_tag: add accuracy based " Abhishek Bapat
2026-06-08  6:22   ` Hao Ge
2026-06-08  8:24     ` Hao Ge
2026-06-08 20:55       ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2026-06-09  0:51         ` Abhishek Bapat
2026-06-09  1:26         ` Hao Ge
2026-06-05 23:36 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] kselftest: alloc_tag: add kselftest for ioctl interface Abhishek Bapat
2026-06-09  6:09   ` Hao Ge
2026-06-09  6:26     ` Hao Ge
2026-06-05 23:36 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] kselftest: alloc_tag: extend the allocinfo ioctl kselftest Abhishek Bapat
2026-06-06  0:08 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] alloc_tag: introduce IOCTL-based filtering for MAP Andrew Morton
2026-06-09  0:02   ` Abhishek Bapat
2026-06-09  0:29     ` Suren Baghdasaryan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5d77fadd-13a9-40ed-a8e8-2982ceb69af2@linux.dev \
    --to=hao.ge@linux.dev \
    --cc=abhishekbapat@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=kent.overstreet@linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=souravpanda@google.com \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.