From: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
To: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/4] Use correct destructor kfunc types
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2025 16:42:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5d7d1ff3-14cd-4c18-a180-3c99e784bbeb@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250725214401.1475224-6-samitolvanen@google.com>
On 7/25/25 2:44 PM, Sami Tolvanen wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> While running BPF self-tests with CONFIG_CFI_CLANG (Clang Control
> Flow Integrity) enabled, I ran into a couple of CFI failures
> in bpf_obj_free_fields() caused by type mismatches between
> the btf_dtor_kfunc_t function pointer type and the registered
> destructor functions.
>
> It looks like we can't change the argument type for these
> functions to match btf_dtor_kfunc_t because the verifier doesn't
> like void pointer arguments for functions used in BPF programs,
> so this series fixes the issue by adding stubs with correct types
> to use as destructors for each instance of this I found in the
> kernel tree.
>
> The last patch changes btf_check_dtor_kfuncs() to enforce the
> function type when CFI is enabled, so we don't end up registering
> destructors that panic the kernel. Perhaps this is something we
> could enforce even without CONFIG_CFI_CLANG?
>
> Sami
>
> ---
> v2:
> - Annotated the stubs with CFI_NOSEAL to fix issues with IBT
> sealing on x86.
> - Changed __bpf_kfunc to explicit __used __retain.
>
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250724223225.1481960-6-samitolvanen@google.com/
>
> ---
> Sami Tolvanen (4):
> bpf: crypto: Use the correct destructor kfunc type
> bpf: net_sched: Use the correct destructor kfunc type
> selftests/bpf: Use the correct destructor kfunc type
> bpf, btf: Enforce destructor kfunc type with CFI
>
> kernel/bpf/btf.c | 7 +++++++
> kernel/bpf/crypto.c | 9 ++++++++-
> net/sched/bpf_qdisc.c | 9 ++++++++-
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c | 9 ++++++++-
> 4 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
>
> base-commit: 95993dc3039e29dabb9a50d074145d4cb757b08b
With this patch set and no CONFIG_CFI_CLANG in .config,
the bpf selftests work okay. In bpf ci, CONFIG_CFI_CLANG
is not enabled.
But if enabling CONFIG_CFI_CLANG, this patch set fixed
./test_progs run issue, but there are some test failures
like
===
test_get_linfo:FAIL:check jited_linfo[1]:ffffffffa000d581 - ffffffffa000d558 > 39
processed 4 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 0 total_states 0 peak_states 0 mark_read 0
#32/186 btf/line_info (No subprog):FAIL
test_get_linfo:FAIL:check jited_linfo[1]:ffffffffa000dee5 - ffffffffa000debc > 39
processed 4 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 0 total_states 0 peak_states 0 mark_read 0
#32/189 btf/line_info (No subprog. zero tailing line_info:FAIL
...
test_get_linfo:FAIL:check jited_linfo[1]:ffffffffa000e069 - ffffffffa000e040 > 38
processed 9 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 0 total_states 1 peak_states 1 mark_read 0
#32/202 btf/line_info (dead subprog + dead start w/ move):FAIL
#32 btf:FAIL
===
The failure probably not related to this patch, but rather related
to CONFIG_CFI_CLANG itself. I will debug this separately.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-25 23:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-25 21:44 [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/4] Use correct destructor kfunc types Sami Tolvanen
2025-07-25 21:44 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/4] bpf: crypto: Use the correct destructor kfunc type Sami Tolvanen
2025-07-25 23:11 ` Yonghong Song
2025-07-28 18:18 ` Sami Tolvanen
2025-07-25 21:44 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/4] bpf: net_sched: " Sami Tolvanen
2025-07-25 21:44 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/4] selftests/bpf: " Sami Tolvanen
2025-07-25 21:44 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 4/4] bpf, btf: Enforce destructor kfunc type with CFI Sami Tolvanen
2025-07-25 23:37 ` Yonghong Song
2025-07-25 23:42 ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2025-07-28 18:21 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/4] Use correct destructor kfunc types Sami Tolvanen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5d7d1ff3-14cd-4c18-a180-3c99e784bbeb@linux.dev \
--to=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=samitolvanen@google.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.