From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
To: cocci@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [cocci] Searching function implementations with variable declarations and statements?
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2025 14:42:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5da0fab5-ebbd-491b-84b1-69db7cec524e@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bd958cff-a9bb-4f6e-8305-e5a09375ccc6@web.de>
> Should any diff output be produced accordingly?
Would you occasionally really find a source code search approach like the following
more appropriate?
Another SmPL script example:
@display3@
statement s;
identifier i;
type t;
@@
t i;
<+...
*s
...+>
Markus_Elfring@Sonne:…/Projekte/Linux/next-analyses> time /usr/bin/spatch --no-loops …/Projekte/Coccinelle/janitor/show_statements_after_variable_declaration2.cocci include/
…
@@ -668,7 +668,6 @@ usb_endpoint_maxp_mult(const struct usb_
…
@@ -723,17 +722,10 @@ usb_ss_max_streams(const struct usb_ss_e
…
real 0m0,243s
user 0m0,199s
sys 0m0,042s
Is there a need to reconsider the handling of curly brackets (for compound statements)?
Regards,
Markus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-01 12:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-01 8:01 [cocci] Searching function implementations with more than a single return? Markus Elfring
2025-07-01 11:54 ` [cocci] Searching function implementations with variable declarations and statements? Markus Elfring
2025-07-01 12:09 ` Julia Lawall
2025-07-01 12:26 ` Markus Elfring
2025-07-01 12:29 ` Julia Lawall
2025-07-01 12:00 ` Markus Elfring
2025-07-01 12:42 ` Markus Elfring [this message]
2025-07-01 13:41 ` Julia Lawall
2025-07-01 13:55 ` Markus Elfring
2025-07-01 14:01 ` Julia Lawall
2025-07-01 13:01 ` [cocci] Searching function implementations with more than a single return? Markus Elfring
2025-07-01 13:40 ` Julia Lawall
2025-07-01 13:50 ` Markus Elfring
2025-07-01 13:59 ` Julia Lawall
2025-07-01 14:06 ` Markus Elfring
2025-07-01 15:17 ` Julia Lawall
2025-07-01 18:00 ` Markus Elfring
2025-07-02 9:11 ` [cocci] Search challenges for “statement lists”? Markus Elfring
2025-07-03 10:00 ` [cocci] Using statement list combinations? Markus Elfring
2025-07-03 10:23 ` Julia Lawall
2025-07-03 10:28 ` Markus Elfring
2025-07-03 11:54 ` Julia Lawall
2025-07-03 13:25 ` Markus Elfring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5da0fab5-ebbd-491b-84b1-69db7cec524e@web.de \
--to=markus.elfring@web.de \
--cc=cocci@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.