All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Leizhen (ThunderTown)" <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Cc: "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>, <rcu@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Robert Elliott <elliott@hpe.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 4/6] rcu: Add RCU stall diagnosis information
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 20:32:19 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5f73bb77-e334-d604-d0cd-0ce7af45f209@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221114112438.GA472998@lothringen>



On 2022/11/14 19:24, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2022 at 09:07:07PM +0800, Zhen Lei wrote:
>> Because RCU CPU stall warnings are driven from the scheduling-clock
>> interrupt handler, a workload consisting of a very large number of
>> short-duration hardware interrupts can result in misleading stall-warning
>> messages.  On systems supporting only a single level of interrupts,
>> that is, where interrupts handlers cannot be interrupted, this can
>> produce misleading diagnostics.  The stack traces will show the
>> innocent-bystander interrupted task, not the interrupts that are
>> at the very least exacerbating the stall.
>>
>> This situation can be improved by displaying the number of interrupts
>> and the CPU time that they have consumed.  Diagnosing other types
>> of stalls can be eased by also providing the count of softirqs and
>> the CPU time that they consumed as well as the number of context
>> switches and the task-level CPU time consumed.
>>
>> Consider the following output given this change:
>>
>> rcu: INFO: rcu_preempt self-detected stall on CPU
>> rcu:     0-....: (1250 ticks this GP) <omitted>
>> rcu:          hardirqs   softirqs   csw/system
>> rcu:  number:      624         45            0
>> rcu: cputime:       69          1         2425   ==> 2500(ms)
>>
>> This output shows that the number of hard and soft interrupts is small,
>> there are no context switches, and the system takes up a lot of time. This
>> indicates that the current task is looping with preemption disabled.
>>
>> The impact on system performance is negligible because snapshot is
>> recorded only once for all continuous RCU stalls.
>>
>> This added debugging information is suppressed by default and can be
>> enabled by building the kernel with CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_CPUTIME=y or
>> by booting with rcupdate.rcu_cpu_stall_cputime=1.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Mukesh Ojha <quic_mojha@quicinc.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
>> ---
>>  .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt         |  6 ++++
>>  kernel/rcu/Kconfig.debug                      | 11 +++++++
>>  kernel/rcu/rcu.h                              |  1 +
>>  kernel/rcu/tree.c                             | 18 +++++++++++
>>  kernel/rcu/tree.h                             | 19 ++++++++++++
>>  kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h                       | 31 +++++++++++++++++++
>>  kernel/rcu/update.c                           |  2 ++
>>  7 files changed, 88 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
>> index 811b2e6d4672685..ee7d9d962591c5d 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
>> @@ -5084,6 +5084,12 @@
>>  			rcupdate.rcu_cpu_stall_timeout to be used (after
>>  			conversion from seconds to milliseconds).
>>  
>> +	rcupdate.rcu_cpu_stall_cputime= [KNL]
>> +			Provide statistics on the cputime and count of
>> +			interrupts and tasks during the sampling period. For
>> +			multiple continuous RCU stalls, all sampling periods
>> +			begin at half of the first RCU stall timeout.
>> +
>>  	rcupdate.rcu_expedited= [KNL]
>>  			Use expedited grace-period primitives, for
>>  			example, synchronize_rcu_expedited() instead
>> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/Kconfig.debug b/kernel/rcu/Kconfig.debug
>> index 1b0c41d490f0588..025566a9ba44667 100644
>> --- a/kernel/rcu/Kconfig.debug
>> +++ b/kernel/rcu/Kconfig.debug
>> @@ -95,6 +95,17 @@ config RCU_EXP_CPU_STALL_TIMEOUT
>>  	  says to use the RCU_CPU_STALL_TIMEOUT value converted from
>>  	  seconds to milliseconds.
>>  
>> +config RCU_CPU_STALL_CPUTIME
>> +	bool "Provide additional RCU stall debug information"
>> +	depends on RCU_STALL_COMMON
>> +	default n
>> +	help
>> +	  Collect statistics during the sampling period, such as the number of
>> +	  (hard interrupts, soft interrupts, task switches) and the cputime of
>> +	  (hard interrupts, soft interrupts, kernel tasks) are added to the
>> +	  RCU stall report. For multiple continuous RCU stalls, all sampling
>> +	  periods begin at half of the first RCU stall timeout.
>> +
>>  config RCU_TRACE
>>  	bool "Enable tracing for RCU"
>>  	depends on DEBUG_KERNEL
>> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcu.h b/kernel/rcu/rcu.h
>> index 96122f203187f39..4844dec36bddb48 100644
>> --- a/kernel/rcu/rcu.h
>> +++ b/kernel/rcu/rcu.h
>> @@ -231,6 +231,7 @@ extern int rcu_cpu_stall_ftrace_dump;
>>  extern int rcu_cpu_stall_suppress;
>>  extern int rcu_cpu_stall_timeout;
>>  extern int rcu_exp_cpu_stall_timeout;
>> +extern int rcu_cpu_stall_cputime;
>>  int rcu_jiffies_till_stall_check(void);
>>  int rcu_exp_jiffies_till_stall_check(void);
>>  
>> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
>> index ed93ddb8203d42c..3921aacfd421ba9 100644
>> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
>> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
>> @@ -866,6 +866,24 @@ static int rcu_implicit_dynticks_qs(struct rcu_data *rdp)
>>  			rdp->rcu_iw_gp_seq = rnp->gp_seq;
>>  			irq_work_queue_on(&rdp->rcu_iw, rdp->cpu);
>>  		}
>> +
>> +		if (rcu_cpu_stall_cputime && rdp->snap_record.gp_seq != rdp->gp_seq) {
>> +			int cpu = rdp->cpu;
>> +			struct rcu_snap_record *rsrp;
>> +			struct kernel_cpustat *kcsp;
>> +
>> +			kcsp = &kcpustat_cpu(cpu);
>> +
>> +			rsrp = &rdp->snap_record;
>> +			rsrp->cputime_irq     = kcpustat_field(kcsp, CPUTIME_IRQ, cpu);
>> +			rsrp->cputime_softirq = kcpustat_field(kcsp, CPUTIME_SOFTIRQ, cpu);
>> +			rsrp->cputime_system  = kcpustat_field(kcsp, CPUTIME_SYSTEM, cpu);
>> +			rsrp->nr_hardirqs = kstat_cpu_irqs_sum(rdp->cpu);
>> +			rsrp->nr_softirqs = kstat_cpu_softirqs_sum(rdp->cpu);
> 
> Getting the sum of all CPU's IRQs, with even two iterations on all of them, look
> costly. So I have to ask: why is this information useful and why can't we deduce
> it from other CPUs stall reports?

Only the RCU stalled CPUs are recorded. Why all CPUs?

static void force_qs_rnp(int (*f)(struct rcu_data *rdp))
{
	rcu_for_each_leaf_node(rnp) {
		if (rnp->qsmask == 0) {
			continue;
		}
		for_each_leaf_node_cpu_mask(rnp, cpu, rnp->qsmask) {
			if (f(rdp))

> 
> I'm also asking because this rcu_cpu_stall_cputime is likely to be very useful for
> distros, to the point that I expect it to be turned on by default as doing a
> snapshot of kcpustat fields is cheap. But doing that wide CPU snapshot is
> definetly going to be an unbearable overhead.

I purposely added a print test, only the RCU stalled CPU would be taken snapshots and
calculated differentials.

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index d1f0d857dc85df5..693e7c83bd17d1e 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -872,6 +872,7 @@ static int rcu_implicit_dynticks_qs(struct rcu_data *rdp)
                        struct rcu_snap_record *rsrp;
                        struct kernel_cpustat *kcsp;

+                       printk("fixme: cpu=%d\n", smp_processor_id());
                        kcsp = &kcpustat_cpu(cpu);

                        rsrp = &rdp->snap_record;

> 
> Thanks.
> .
> 

-- 
Regards,
  Zhen Lei

  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-14 12:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-11 13:07 [PATCH v7 0/6] rcu: Add RCU stall diagnosis information Zhen Lei
2022-11-11 13:07 ` [PATCH v7 1/6] genirq: Fix the return type of kstat_cpu_irqs_sum() Zhen Lei
2022-11-11 13:07 ` [PATCH v7 2/6] sched: Add helper kstat_cpu_softirqs_sum() Zhen Lei
2022-11-14 11:42   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-11-14 12:45     ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2022-11-14 12:50       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-11-14 14:26         ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2022-11-11 13:07 ` [PATCH v7 3/6] sched: Add helper nr_context_switches_cpu() Zhen Lei
2022-11-11 13:07 ` [PATCH v7 4/6] rcu: Add RCU stall diagnosis information Zhen Lei
2022-11-14 11:24   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-11-14 12:32     ` Leizhen (ThunderTown) [this message]
2022-11-14 12:46       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-11-16 22:39   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-11-17  1:57     ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2022-11-17 12:22       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-11-17 13:25         ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2022-11-17 14:26           ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-11-18  2:03             ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2022-11-11 13:07 ` [PATCH v7 5/6] doc: Document CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_CPUTIME=y stall information Zhen Lei
2022-11-12 22:52   ` kernel test robot
2022-11-14  9:29     ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2022-11-16 22:55   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-11-17  2:03     ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2022-11-17 12:23       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-11-11 13:07 ` [PATCH v7 6/6] rcu: Align the output of RCU stall Zhen Lei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5f73bb77-e334-d604-d0cd-0ce7af45f209@huawei.com \
    --to=thunder.leizhen@huawei.com \
    --cc=elliott@hpe.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=quic_neeraju@quicinc.com \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.