You use both fixed sensor and dynamic sensors?

2021-01-15 

chunhui.jia 



发件人：Lei Yu <yulei.sh@bytedance.com>
发送时间：2021-01-15 10:23
主题：Re: Intel-ipmi-oem repo
收件人："Vernon Mauery"<vernon.mauery@linux.intel.com>
抄送："Willy Tu"<wltu@google.com>,"OpenBMC Maillist"<openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org>,"chunhui.jia"<chunhui.jia@linux.intel.com>,"Ed Tanous"<edtanous@google.com>,"Brad Bishop"<bradleyb@fuzziesquirrel.com>,"apparao.puli"<apparao.puli@linux.intel.com>,"Vijay Khemka"<vijaykhemka@fb.com>

On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 3:23 AM Vernon Mauery 
<vernon.mauery@linux.intel.com> wrote: 
> I would say that if IBM is the only company using the sensor 
> implementation that is currently in ipmid, it would be best to move it 
> to the IBM OEM layer. But it is difficult in a project this size who is 
> using what. So leaving it in ipmid for now is fine. 
> 

This is not the case. Bytedance uses ipmid with fixed yaml as well. 
In our case, we have all the sensors on DBus created by 
entity-manager/dbus-sensors, and only part of them are necessary for 
ipmi. 
So we specifically define the necessary sensors (and 
inventory-sensors) in yaml and use the current ipmid to implement 
them. 

AFAIK Yadro and Ampere uses ipmid with fixed yaml too. 

--  
BRs, 
Lei YU