All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jay Vosburgh <jay.vosburgh@canonical.com>
To: Toni Peltonen <peltzi@peltzi.fi>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] bonding: fix 802.3ad state sent to partner when unbinding slave
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 16:29:58 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6004.1543278598@famine> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181126225438.GA2252@peltzi-E7470.localdomain>

Toni Peltonen <peltzi@peltzi.fi> wrote:

>Previously when unbinding a slave the 802.3ad implementation only told
>partner that the port is not suitable for aggregation by setting the port
>aggregation state from aggregatable to individual. This is not enough. If the
>physical layer still stays up and we only unbinded this port from the bond there
>is nothing in the aggregation status alone to prevent the partner from sending
>traffic towards us. To ensure that the partner doesn't consider this
>port at all anymore we should also disable collecting and distributing to
>signal that this actor is going away.
>
>I have tested this behaviour againts Arista EOS switches with mlx5 cards
>(physical link stays up when even when interface is down) and simulated
>the same situation virtually Linux <-> Linux with two network namespaces
>running two veth device pairs. In both cases setting aggregation to
>individual doesn't alone prevent traffic from being to sent towards this
>port given that the link stays up in partners end. Partner still keeps
>it's end in collecting + distributing state and continues until timeout is
>reached. In most cases this means we are losing the traffic partner sends
>towards our port while we wait for timeout. This is most visible with slow
>periodic time (LAPC rate slow).

	"LAPC" -> "LACP"

>Other open source implementations like Open VSwitch and libreswitch, and
>vendor implementations like Arista EOS, seem to disable collecting +
>distributing to when doing similar port disabling/detaching/removing change.
>With this patch kernel implementation would behave the same way and ensure
>partner doesn't consider our actor viable anymore.

	After re-reading the relevant bits of 802.1AX (particularly
5.4.9 on recordPDU and update_Selected) I'm going to suggest also
clearing AD_STATE_SYNCHRONIZATION, based on:

	Partner_Oper_Port_State.Synchronization is also set to TRUE if
	the value of Actor_State.Aggregation in the received PDU is set
	to FALSE (i.e., indicates an Individual link),
	Actor_State.Synchronization in the received PDU is set to TRUE,
	and LACP will actively maintain the link.

	Per the above, learing _SYNC in the LACPDU should un-sync the
port, inducing the Mux state machine (figure 5-15) to exit C_D state and
go to ATTACHED state (disabling Coll/Dist).

	But, either way, as this is a hint to get the link partner to
stop using the port, this looks reasonable to me.  

Acked-by: Jay Vosburgh <jay.vosburgh@canonical.com>

	-J	

>Signed-off-by: Toni Peltonen <peltzi@peltzi.fi>
>---
> drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c
>index f43fb2f958a5..6776c33753dc 100644
>--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c
>+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c
>@@ -2086,6 +2086,8 @@ void bond_3ad_unbind_slave(struct slave *slave)
> 		   aggregator->aggregator_identifier);
> 
> 	/* Tell the partner that this port is not suitable for aggregation */
>+	port->actor_oper_port_state &= ~AD_STATE_COLLECTING;
>+	port->actor_oper_port_state &= ~AD_STATE_DISTRIBUTING;
> 	port->actor_oper_port_state &= ~AD_STATE_AGGREGATION;
> 	__update_lacpdu_from_port(port);
> 	ad_lacpdu_send(port);
>-- 
>2.19.0

---
	-Jay Vosburgh, jay.vosburgh@canonical.com

  reply	other threads:[~2018-11-27 11:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-26 22:54 [PATCH net] bonding: fix 802.3ad state sent to partner when unbinding slave Toni Peltonen
2018-11-27  0:29 ` Jay Vosburgh [this message]
2018-11-27 11:44   ` Toni Peltonen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6004.1543278598@famine \
    --to=jay.vosburgh@canonical.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peltzi@peltzi.fi \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.