From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (ext-mx15.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.110.20]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q9GJHCn7015530 for ; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 15:17:12 -0400 Received: from smtp1.pacifier.net (smtp1.pacifier.net [64.255.237.171]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q9GJHB3X016019 for ; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 15:17:11 -0400 Received: from laptop.localnet (ip136.133.dsl-acs2.pdx.iinet.com [209.20.133.136]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp1.pacifier.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E8952CA03 for ; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 12:17:11 -0700 (PDT) From: ben Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 12:17:10 -0700 Message-ID: <6004025.KRaXd7Eq3X@laptop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: [linux-lvm] thin pool grows but meta data does not? Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: To: linux-lvm@redhat.com Experimenting with thin pools I noticed that extending a thin pool doesn't seem to make the metadata larger. Is that the expected behavior? Thank you.