From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
To: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "John Johansen" <john.johansen@canonical.com>,
"Roberto Sassu" <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>,
"Fan Wu" <wufan@kernel.org>, "Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>,
"Günther Noack" <gnoack@google.com>,
"Kees Cook" <kees@kernel.org>,
"Micah Morton" <mortonm@chromium.org>,
"Casey Schaufler" <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
"Tetsuo Handa" <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
"Nicolas Bouchinet" <nicolas.bouchinet@oss.cyber.gouv.fr>,
"Xiu Jianfeng" <xiujianfeng@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 10/34] lsm: rework lsm_active_cnt and lsm_idlist[]
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2025 15:02:51 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <603c96a486c97e20a4e86580e207cce9cac90239.camel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250916220355.252592-46-paul@paul-moore.com>
On Tue, 2025-09-16 at 18:03 -0400, Paul Moore wrote:
> Move the LSM active count and lsm_id list declarations out of a header
> that is visible across the kernel and into a header that is limited to
> the LSM framework. This not only helps keep the include/linux headers
> smaller and cleaner, it helps prevent misuse of these variables.
>
> Reviewed-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
> Reviewed-by: John Johansen <john.johhansen@canonical.com>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> include/linux/security.h | 2 --
> security/lsm.h | 5 +++++
> security/lsm_init.c | 6 ------
> security/lsm_syscalls.c | 2 ++
> security/security.c | 3 +++
> 5 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/security.h b/include/linux/security.h
> index 521bcb5b9717..8560c50edd2e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/security.h
> +++ b/include/linux/security.h
> @@ -167,8 +167,6 @@ struct lsm_prop {
> };
>
> extern const char *const lockdown_reasons[LOCKDOWN_CONFIDENTIALITY_MAX+1];
> -extern u32 lsm_active_cnt;
> -extern const struct lsm_id *lsm_idlist[];
>
> /* These functions are in security/commoncap.c */
> extern int cap_capable(const struct cred *cred, struct user_namespace *ns,
> diff --git a/security/lsm.h b/security/lsm.h
> index 0e1731bad4a7..dbe755c45e57 100644
> --- a/security/lsm.h
> +++ b/security/lsm.h
> @@ -7,6 +7,11 @@
> #define _LSM_H_
>
> #include <linux/lsm_hooks.h>
> +#include <linux/lsm_count.h>
> +
> +/* List of configured LSMs */
> +extern unsigned int lsm_active_cnt;
> +extern const struct lsm_id *lsm_idlist[];
>
> /* LSM blob configuration */
> extern struct lsm_blob_sizes blob_sizes;
> diff --git a/security/lsm_init.c b/security/lsm_init.c
> index 2e76cefb1585..9e495a36a332 100644
> --- a/security/lsm_init.c
> +++ b/security/lsm_init.c
> @@ -217,12 +217,6 @@ static void __init initialize_lsm(struct lsm_info *lsm)
> }
> }
>
> -/*
> - * Current index to use while initializing the lsm id list.
> - */
> -u32 lsm_active_cnt __ro_after_init;
> -const struct lsm_id *lsm_idlist[MAX_LSM_COUNT];
> -
> /* Populate ordered LSMs list from comma-separated LSM name list. */
> static void __init ordered_lsm_parse(const char *order, const char *origin)
> {
> diff --git a/security/lsm_syscalls.c b/security/lsm_syscalls.c
> index 8440948a690c..5648b1f0ce9c 100644
> --- a/security/lsm_syscalls.c
> +++ b/security/lsm_syscalls.c
> @@ -17,6 +17,8 @@
> #include <linux/lsm_hooks.h>
> #include <uapi/linux/lsm.h>
>
> +#include "lsm.h"
> +
> /**
> * lsm_name_to_attr - map an LSM attribute name to its ID
> * @name: name of the attribute
> diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c
> index ff6da6735e2a..add46073af0c 100644
> --- a/security/security.c
> +++ b/security/security.c
> @@ -73,6 +73,9 @@ const char *const lockdown_reasons[LOCKDOWN_CONFIDENTIALITY_MAX + 1] = {
> [LOCKDOWN_CONFIDENTIALITY_MAX] = "confidentiality",
> };
>
> +unsigned int lsm_active_cnt __ro_after_init;
> +const struct lsm_id *lsm_idlist[MAX_LSM_COUNT];
> +
> struct lsm_blob_sizes blob_sizes;
>
> struct kmem_cache *lsm_file_cache;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-19 19:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-16 22:03 [PATCH v4 0/34] Rework the LSM initialization Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 01/34] lsm: split the notifier code out into lsm_notifier.c Paul Moore
2025-09-19 10:44 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 02/34] lsm: split the init code out into lsm_init.c Paul Moore
2025-09-19 10:45 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 03/34] lsm: consolidate lsm_allowed() and prepare_lsm() into lsm_prepare() Paul Moore
2025-09-19 10:45 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 04/34] lsm: introduce looping macros for the initialization code Paul Moore
2025-09-19 10:45 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 05/34] lsm: integrate report_lsm_order() code into caller Paul Moore
2025-09-19 10:45 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 06/34] lsm: integrate lsm_early_cred() and lsm_early_task() " Paul Moore
2025-09-19 10:45 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 07/34] lsm: rename ordered_lsm_init() to lsm_init_ordered() Paul Moore
2025-09-19 10:45 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 08/34] lsm: replace the name field with a pointer to the lsm_id struct Paul Moore
2025-09-19 19:02 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 09/34] lsm: rename the lsm order variables for consistency Paul Moore
2025-09-19 19:02 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 10/34] lsm: rework lsm_active_cnt and lsm_idlist[] Paul Moore
2025-09-19 19:02 ` Mimi Zohar [this message]
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 11/34] lsm: get rid of the lsm_names list and do some cleanup Paul Moore
2025-09-19 19:15 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-21 19:23 ` Paul Moore
2025-09-22 10:52 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-22 21:52 ` Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 12/34] lsm: rework the LSM enable/disable setter/getter functions Paul Moore
2025-09-19 19:04 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 13/34] lsm: rename exists_ordered_lsm() to lsm_order_exists() Paul Moore
2025-09-19 19:05 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 14/34] lsm: rename/rework append_ordered_lsm() into lsm_order_append() Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 15/34] lsm: rename/rework ordered_lsm_parse() to lsm_order_parse() Paul Moore
2025-09-18 11:29 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-18 15:38 ` Paul Moore
2025-09-18 15:55 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 16/34] lsm: cleanup the LSM blob size code Paul Moore
2025-09-18 15:14 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 17/34] lsm: cleanup initialize_lsm() and rename to lsm_init_single() Paul Moore
2025-09-18 15:28 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 18/34] lsm: fold lsm_init_ordered() into security_init() Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 19/34] lsm: add/tweak function header comment blocks in lsm_init.c Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 20/34] lsm: cleanup the debug and console output " Paul Moore
2025-09-18 15:50 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-18 15:54 ` Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 21/34] lsm: output available LSMs when debugging Paul Moore
2025-09-18 17:11 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 22/34] lsm: group lsm_order_parse() with the other lsm_order_*() functions Paul Moore
2025-09-18 17:22 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 23/34] lsm: introduce an initcall mechanism into the LSM framework Paul Moore
2025-09-18 17:19 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 24/34] loadpin: move initcalls to " Paul Moore
2025-09-18 11:15 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-18 15:27 ` Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 25/34] ipe: " Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 26/34] smack: " Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 27/34] tomoyo: " Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 28/34] safesetid: " Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 29/34] apparmor: " Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 30/34] lockdown: " Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 31/34] ima,evm: " Paul Moore
2025-09-30 20:11 ` Paul Moore
2025-10-01 17:03 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-10-01 17:23 ` Paul Moore
2025-10-10 16:53 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-10-10 19:21 ` Paul Moore
2025-10-10 10:19 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 32/34] selinux: " Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:04 ` [PATCH v4 33/34] lsm: consolidate all of the LSM framework initcalls Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:04 ` [PATCH v4 34/34] lsm: add a LSM_STARTED_ALL notification event Paul Moore
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=603c96a486c97e20a4e86580e207cce9cac90239.camel@linux.ibm.com \
--to=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=gnoack@google.com \
--cc=john.johansen@canonical.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mic@digikod.net \
--cc=mortonm@chromium.org \
--cc=nicolas.bouchinet@oss.cyber.gouv.fr \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--cc=roberto.sassu@huawei.com \
--cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wufan@kernel.org \
--cc=xiujianfeng@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.