From: jaf <jaf@lcsaudio.com>
To: Michael Schmitz <schmitz@opal.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org,
linuxppc-user@lists.linuxppc.org, jeffk@jdkoftinoff.com
Subject: Re: Having linking problems with atomic_inc(), atomic_dec_and_test() in user app, help!
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2002 09:00:56 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <60823947811-BeMail@sugoi> (raw)
Hi Michael,
>> Also, what does "relocation truncated to fit: R_PPC_REL24
atomic_inc(atomic_t
>> *)" mean?
>
>About as much as 'unresolved external reference'. atomic_inc isn't
defined
>in the scope of your code. Look at the kernel headers; it might be
inside
>#ifdef __KRENEL__ (actually it is).
I see... when I wrote the code using Red Hat, this was not the case. I
assumed
things would be similar under all Linuxes... apparently a bad
assumption.
>Why do you think you need to use atomic_inc directly instead of some
>pthreads wrapper?
I wasn't able to find a decent equivalent to atomic_t in the pthreads
API.
The closest thing I could see would be to wrap my counter increments/
decrements in a pthread_mutex_t to serialize them, but creating a
separate mutex for each atomic counter seems a bit expensive/
inefficient, considering there may be thousands of such atomic counters
active at once. Is there some other way to use pthreads to get an
atomic counter? Or is a pthread_mutex_t really efficient enough to
make a decent atomic counter out of? Or do I need to redesign how my
application works, because there is no good way to do a cheap, portable
user-land atomic counter under Linux? :^(
Jeremy
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
next reply other threads:[~2002-01-04 17:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-01-04 17:00 jaf [this message]
2002-01-04 17:44 ` Having linking problems with atomic_inc(), atomic_dec_and_test() in user app, help! Michael Schmitz
2002-01-04 19:04 ` Tom Rini
2002-01-04 19:50 ` Having linking problems with atomic_inc(), atomic_dec_and_test()in " Frank Rowand
2002-01-04 19:52 ` Michael Schmitz
2002-01-04 18:33 ` Having linking problems with atomic_inc(), atomic_dec_and_test() in " Kevin B. Hendricks
2002-01-04 18:57 ` Kevin B. Hendricks
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-01-04 3:24 Jeremy Friesner
2002-01-04 11:46 ` Jerry Van Baren
2002-01-04 12:57 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2002-01-04 14:18 ` Michael Schmitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=60823947811-BeMail@sugoi \
--to=jaf@lcsaudio.com \
--cc=jeffk@jdkoftinoff.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
--cc=linuxppc-user@lists.linuxppc.org \
--cc=schmitz@opal.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.