Re: [PATCH v1] mm/mempolicy: fix migrate_to_node() assuming there is at least one VMA in a MM

[David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>]

On 22.11.24 07:19, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Nov 2024 15:27:46 -0500 "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com> wrote:
> 
>> I hate the extra check because syzbot can cause this as this should
>> basically never happen in real life, but it seems we have to add it.
> 
> So..
> 
> --- a/mm/mempolicy.c~mm-mempolicy-fix-migrate_to_node-assuming-there-is-at-least-one-vma-in-a-mm-fix
> +++ a/mm/mempolicy.c
> @@ -1080,7 +1080,7 @@ static long migrate_to_node(struct mm_st
>   
>   	mmap_read_lock(mm);
>   	vma = find_vma(mm, 0);
> -	if (!vma) {
> +	if (unlikely(!vma)) {
>   		mmap_read_unlock(mm);
>   		return 0;
>   	}
> _
> 
> ?

Why not, at least for documentation purposes. Because I don't think this 
is any fast-path we really care about, so expect the runtime effects to 
be mostly negligible. Thanks!

-- 
Cheers,

David / dhildenb