From: Nikolai Zhubr <zhubr.2@gmail.com>
To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@orcam.me.uk>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/PCI: Handle PIRQ routing tables with no router device given
Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2021 13:28:34 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <60E43052.8040802@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.21.2107051133010.33206@angie.orcam.me.uk>
Hello Maciej,
05.07.2021 13:46, Maciej W. Rozycki:
> PIRQ routing tables provided by the PCI BIOS usually specify the PCI
> vendor:device ID as well as the bus address of the device implementing
> the PIRQ router, e.g.:
[...]
> linux-x86-pirq-router-nodev.diff
This one throws a panic in bus_find_device() here.
I can not yet get a good printout because scrollback does not work.
Maybe it is because of 4.14 kernel, and in order to apply it I had to
change pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot back to pci_get_bus_and_slot.
I'll try to also test with 5.x kernel later today.
Thank you,
Regards,
Nikolai
> Index: linux-macro-ide-tty/arch/x86/pci/irq.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-macro-ide-tty.orig/arch/x86/pci/irq.c
> +++ linux-macro-ide-tty/arch/x86/pci/irq.c
> @@ -908,10 +908,32 @@ static struct pci_dev *pirq_router_dev;
> * chipset" ?
> */
>
> +static bool __init pirq_try_router(struct irq_router *r,
> + struct irq_routing_table *rt,
> + struct pci_dev *dev)
> +{
> + struct irq_router_handler *h;
> +
> + DBG(KERN_DEBUG "PCI: Trying IRQ router for [%04x:%04x]\n",
> + dev->vendor, dev->device);
> +
> + for (h = pirq_routers; h->vendor; h++) {
> + /* First look for a router match */
> + if (rt->rtr_vendor == h->vendor&&
> + h->probe(r, dev, rt->rtr_device))
> + return true;
> + /* Fall back to a device match */
> + if (dev->vendor == h->vendor&&
> + h->probe(r, dev, dev->device))
> + return true;
> + }
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> static void __init pirq_find_router(struct irq_router *r)
> {
> struct irq_routing_table *rt = pirq_table;
> - struct irq_router_handler *h;
> + struct pci_dev *dev;
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_BIOS
> if (!rt->signature) {
> @@ -930,27 +952,28 @@ static void __init pirq_find_router(stru
> DBG(KERN_DEBUG "PCI: Attempting to find IRQ router for [%04x:%04x]\n",
> rt->rtr_vendor, rt->rtr_device);
>
> - pirq_router_dev = pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot(0, rt->rtr_bus,
> - rt->rtr_devfn);
> - if (!pirq_router_dev) {
> - DBG(KERN_DEBUG "PCI: Interrupt router not found at "
> - "%02x:%02x\n", rt->rtr_bus, rt->rtr_devfn);
> - return;
> + /* Use any vendor:device provided by the routing table or try all. */
> + if (rt->rtr_vendor) {
> + dev = pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot(0, rt->rtr_bus,
> + rt->rtr_devfn);
> + if (pirq_try_router(r, rt, dev))
> + pirq_router_dev = dev;
> + } else {
> + for_each_pci_dev(dev) {
> + if (pirq_try_router(r, rt, dev)) {
> + pirq_router_dev = dev;
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> }
>
> - for (h = pirq_routers; h->vendor; h++) {
> - /* First look for a router match */
> - if (rt->rtr_vendor == h->vendor&&
> - h->probe(r, pirq_router_dev, rt->rtr_device))
> - break;
> - /* Fall back to a device match */
> - if (pirq_router_dev->vendor == h->vendor&&
> - h->probe(r, pirq_router_dev, pirq_router_dev->device))
> - break;
> - }
> - dev_info(&pirq_router_dev->dev, "%s IRQ router [%04x:%04x]\n",
> - pirq_router.name,
> - pirq_router_dev->vendor, pirq_router_dev->device);
> + if (pirq_router_dev)
> + dev_info(&pirq_router_dev->dev, "%s IRQ router [%04x:%04x]\n",
> + pirq_router.name,
> + pirq_router_dev->vendor, pirq_router_dev->device);
> + else
> + DBG(KERN_DEBUG "PCI: Interrupt router not found at "
> + "%02x:%02x\n", rt->rtr_bus, rt->rtr_devfn);
>
> /* The device remains referenced for the kernel lifetime */
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-06 10:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-05 10:46 [PATCH] x86/PCI: Handle PIRQ routing tables with no router device given Maciej W. Rozycki
2021-07-06 10:28 ` Nikolai Zhubr [this message]
2021-07-06 11:35 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=60E43052.8040802@gmail.com \
--to=zhubr.2@gmail.com \
--cc=arnd@kernel.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=macro@orcam.me.uk \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.