Re: Re: Xen-devel Digest, Vol 71, Issue 85

[domiel forty-two <domiel42@yahoo.com.au>]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1673 bytes --]

Keir,

Thanks for the clarification.

D.




________________________________
From: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>
To: domiel forty-two <domiel42@yahoo.com.au>; xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Sent: Fri, 18 February, 2011 6:08:05 PM
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Xen-devel Digest, Vol 71, Issue 85

On 18/02/2011 02:44, "domiel forty-two" <domiel42@yahoo.com.au> wrote:

> Hi all!
> 
> Did the nested xen stuff make it into the xen-unstable (4.1-rc1?) tree as
> suggested back in January by Tim Deegan?

Tim meant that the patches may be applied to xen-unstable after 4.1 is
branched from it. I.e., they are candidates for 4.2, not 4.1.

-- Keir

> TIA
> 
> 
> Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 16:01:12 +0000
> From: Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@citrix.com>
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 00/12] Nested Virtualization: Overview
> To: Christoph Egger <Christoph.Egger@amd.com>
> Cc: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>,    "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com"
>     <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>, "Dong,     Eddie" <eddie.dong@intel.com>
> Message-ID: <20110107160112.GC5651@whitby.uk.xensource.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> 
> Hi, 
> 
> At 16:02 +0000 on 20 Dec (1292860962), Christoph Egger wrote:
>> This patch series brings Nested Virtualization to Xen.
>> This is the seventh patch series.
> 
> Thanks for this.  I've commented on patch 4 (core) and patch 12
> (hap-on-hap) separately.  Also I think we need an Acked-by: from Eddie
> for patches 1-8. 
> 
> Apart from that I think we can check these in as soon as the 4.1
> branch has been taken, and fix up any remaining issues in-tree.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Tim.


      

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 3273 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 138 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel