From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yuri Weinstein Subject: Re: teuthology job priorities Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 12:21:49 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <613662148.8423810.1432830109340.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> References: <5566E0AD.80401@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from mx5-phx2.redhat.com ([209.132.183.37]:46905 "EHLO mx5-phx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753518AbbE1QWw convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 May 2015 12:22:52 -0400 In-Reply-To: <5566E0AD.80401@dachary.org> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Loic Dachary Cc: Ceph Development I usually use:=20 priority [90,100] for point releases validations. This is a good thread to bring up for open approval/disapproval. Does that sound reasonable ?? Thx YuriW ----- Original Message ----- =46rom: "Loic Dachary" To: "Ceph Development" Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 2:32:29 AM Subject: teuthology job priorities Hi, This morning I'll schedule a job with priority 50, assuming nobody will= get mad at me for using such a low priority because the associated bug= fix blocks the release of v0.94.2 (http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/1154= 6) and also assuming noone uses a priority lower than 100 just to get i= n front of the nightlies[1]. In my imagination priority [0,100] is for emergencies priority [100,1000] is to schedule a job with higher priority than t= he nightlies priority 1000 (the default) is for all automated tests and no human = being wait on them (the nightlies for instance). Does someone have a different mapping in mind ? Cheers [1] the nightlies http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph-releases/wiki/H= OWTO_monitor_the_automated_tests_AKA_nightlies --=20 Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html