From: L A Walsh <xfs@tlinx.org>
To: linux-xfs <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Subject: cause of xfsdump msg: root ino 192 differs from mount dir ino 256
Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2021 12:39:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <61804254.3070001@tlinx.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211026004814.GA5111@dread.disaster.area>
When I xfsdump my /home partition, I see the above diagnostic
where it lists "bind mount?" might be involved, but as far as
I can see, that's not the case.
grepping for '/home\s' on output of mount:
/bin/mount|grep -P '/home\s'
shows only 1 entry -- nothing mounted on top of it:
/dev/mapper/Space-Home2 on /home type xfs (...)
I have bind-mounts of things like
/home/opt on /opt, but that shouldn't affect the root node,
as far as I know.
So what would cause the root node to differ from the mountdir
ino?
I try mounting the same filesystem someplace new:
# df .
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/Space/Home2 2.0T 1.5T 569G 73% /home
mkdir /home2
Ishtar:home# mount /dev/Space/Home2 /home2
Ishtar:home# ll -di /home /home2
256 drwxr-xr-x 40 4096 Nov 1 10:23 /home/
256 drwxr-xr-x 40 4096 Nov 1 10:23 /home2/
Shows 256 as the root inode. So why is xfsdump claiming
192 is root inode?
I used xfs_db and 192 is allocated to a normal file, while
256 displays nothing for the filename.
How should I further debug this?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-01 19:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-25 21:30 xfsrestore'ing from file backups don't restore...why not? L A Walsh
2021-10-26 0:48 ` Dave Chinner
[not found] ` <617B5DA3.7060106@tlinx.org>
2021-10-29 19:24 ` L A Walsh
2021-10-31 21:28 ` L A Walsh
2021-11-01 20:23 ` cause of xfsdump msg: root ino 192 differs from mount dir ino 256 L A Walsh
2021-11-01 21:12 ` Dave Chinner
2021-11-02 1:35 ` L A Walsh
2021-11-02 1:47 ` L A Walsh
2021-11-02 4:45 ` L A Walsh
2021-11-02 14:24 ` xfsrestore'ing from file backups don't restore...why not? Eric Sandeen
2021-11-01 19:39 ` L A Walsh [this message]
2021-11-02 14:29 ` cause of xfsdump msg: root ino 192 differs from mount dir ino 256 Eric Sandeen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=61804254.3070001@tlinx.org \
--to=xfs@tlinx.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.