All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dongsheng Yang <dongsheng.yang@linux.dev>
To: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
Cc: cengku@gmail.com, dm-devel@lists.linux.dev, chenl311@chinatelecom.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] dm pcache: fix cache info indexing
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2025 11:05:05 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <61a94278-617b-4f93-b35e-83b44833d425@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e40cf2ec-d087-65f9-45a0-a47119c89ced@redhat.com>


在 12/5/2025 12:01 AM, Mikulas Patocka 写道:
>
> On Thu, 4 Dec 2025, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
>
>> From: Li Chen <chenl311@chinatelecom.cn>
>>
>> The on-media cache_info index used sizeof(struct) instead of the
>> 4K metadata stride, so gc_percent updates from dmsetup message
>> were written between slots and lost after reboot. Use
>> PCACHE_CACHE_INFO_SIZE in get_cache_info_addr() and align
>> info_index with the slot returned by pcache_meta_find_latest().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Li Chen <chenl311@chinatelecom.cn>
>> Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang <dongsheng.yang@linux.dev>
>> ---
>>   drivers/md/dm-pcache/cache.c | 8 ++++++--
>>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-pcache/cache.c b/drivers/md/dm-pcache/cache.c
>> index 9289c016b7c9..bcc4e509aa69 100644
>> --- a/drivers/md/dm-pcache/cache.c
>> +++ b/drivers/md/dm-pcache/cache.c
>> @@ -8,9 +8,11 @@
>>   
>>   struct kmem_cache *key_cache;
>>   
>> -static inline struct pcache_cache_info *get_cache_info_addr(struct pcache_cache *cache)
>> +static inline struct pcache_cache_info *
>> +get_cache_info_addr(struct pcache_cache *cache)
>>   {
>> -	return cache->cache_info_addr + cache->info_index;
>> +	return (struct pcache_cache_info *)((char *)cache->cache_info_addr +
>> +						(size_t)cache->info_index * PCACHE_CACHE_INFO_SIZE);
>>   }
>>   
>>   static void cache_info_write(struct pcache_cache *cache)
>> @@ -49,6 +51,8 @@ static int cache_info_init(struct pcache_cache *cache, struct pcache_cache_optio
>>   			return -EINVAL;
>>   		}
>>   
>> +		cache->info_index = ((char *)cache_info_addr - (char *)cache->cache_info_addr) / PCACHE_CACHE_INFO_SIZE;
>> +
>>   		return 0;
>>   	}
>>   
>> -- 
>> 2.43.0
> I already staged the patch below? Should I revert it and stage your new
> patch?


Yes, please revert it, I will send a v2 patchset, please pick the v2 patch.


Thanx

>
> Mikulas
>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-pcache/cache.c b/drivers/md/dm-pcache/cache.c
> index d8e92367d947..9554d1158450 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/dm-pcache/cache.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/dm-pcache/cache.c
> @@ -8,9 +8,11 @@
>
>   struct kmem_cache *key_cache;
>
> -static inline struct pcache_cache_info *get_cache_info_addr(struct pcache_cache *cache)
> +static inline struct pcache_cache_info *
> +get_cache_info_addr(struct pcache_cache *cache)
>   {
> -       return cache->cache_info_addr + cache->info_index;
> +       return (struct pcache_cache_info *)((char *)cache->cache_info_addr
> +
> +                                               (size_t)cache->info_index * PCACHE_CACHE_INFO_SIZE);
>   }
>
>   static void cache_info_write(struct pcache_cache *cache)
> @@ -40,7 +42,12 @@ static int cache_info_init(struct pcache_cache *cache,
> struct pcache_cache_optio
>          if (IS_ERR(cache_info_addr))
>                  return PTR_ERR(cache_info_addr);
>
> -       if (cache_info_addr) {
> +    if (cache_info_addr) {
> +               int index = ((char *)cache_info_addr - (char *)cache->cache_info_addr) /
> +                               PCACHE_CACHE_INFO_SIZE;
> +
> +               cache->info_index = (index + 1) % PCACHE_META_INDEX_MAX;
> +
>                  if (opts->data_crc !=
>                                  (cache->cache_info.flags & PCACHE_CACHE_FLAGS_DATA_CRC)) {
>                          pcache_dev_err(pcache, "invalid option for data_crc: %s, expected: %s",
>

  reply	other threads:[~2025-12-05  3:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-04  2:53 [PATCH 1/3] dm-pcache: advance slot index before writing slot Dongsheng Yang
2025-12-04  2:53 ` [PATCH 2/3] dm pcache: fix cache info indexing Dongsheng Yang
2025-12-04  3:09   ` Zheng Gu
2025-12-04 16:01   ` Mikulas Patocka
2025-12-05  3:05     ` Dongsheng Yang [this message]
2025-12-04  2:53 ` [PATCH 3/3] dm pcache: fix segment " Dongsheng Yang
2025-12-04  3:10   ` Zheng Gu
2025-12-04 15:59   ` Mikulas Patocka
2025-12-05  3:05     ` Dongsheng Yang
2025-12-04  3:08 ` [PATCH 1/3] dm-pcache: advance slot index before writing slot Zheng Gu
2025-12-04 16:13 ` Mikulas Patocka
2025-12-05  3:01   ` Dongsheng Yang
2025-12-06 11:36     ` Mikulas Patocka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=61a94278-617b-4f93-b35e-83b44833d425@linux.dev \
    --to=dongsheng.yang@linux.dev \
    --cc=cengku@gmail.com \
    --cc=chenl311@chinatelecom.cn \
    --cc=dm-devel@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.