From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
To: Tamas K Lengyel <tamas.lengyel@zentific.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] arm/mem_access: adjust check_and_get_page to not rely on current
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2016 12:50:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <61cf5b48-30ec-7c0d-798a-5750421c5334@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAErYnsgTcOkVRCh_0nuBneazE4npwdAdDHWkw+L=4W6QXo1_Hw@mail.gmail.com>
Hello Tamas,
On 12/12/16 23:47, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 2:28 PM, Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com> wrote:
>> On 12/12/2016 19:41, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
>>> On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 12:11 PM, Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> On 12/12/16 18:42, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 4:46 AM, Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>> I see. So IMHO this is not a problem with mem_access in general, but a
>>> problem with a specific application of mem_access on ARM (ie.
>>> restricting read access to guest pagetables). It's a pitty that ARM
>>> doesn't report the IPA automatically during a stage-2 violation.
>>
>>
>> I don't understand what you are asking for here. If you are not able to
>> access stage-1 page table how would you be able to find the IPA?
>
> I'm not asking for anything, I'm expressing how it's a pity that ARM
> CPUs are limited in this regard compared to x86.
Give a look at the ARM ARM before complaining. The IPA will be provided
(see HPFAR) on a stage-2 data/prefetch abort fault.
>
>>
>> It works on x86 because, IIRC, you do a software page table walking.
>> Although, I don't think you have particular write/read access checking on
>> x86.
>
> I don't recall there being any software page walking being involved on
> x86. Why would that be needed? On x86 we get the guest physical
> address recorded by the CPU automatically. AFAIK in case the pagetable
> was unaccessible for the translation of a VA, we would get an event
> with the pagetable's PA and the type of event that generated it (ie.
> reading during translation).
You are talking about a different thing. The function
p2m_mem_access_check_and_get_page is only used during copy_*_guest
helpers which will copy hypercall buffer.
If you give a look at the x86 code, for simplicity let's focus on HVM,
the function __hvm_copy will call paging_gva_to_gfn which is doing the
table walk in software (see arch/x86/mm/hap/guest_walk.c). No hardware
instruction like on ARM...
Although, it looks like that there is hardware instruction to do address
translation (see nvmx_hap_walk_L1_p2m), but only for nested
virtualization. And even in this case, they will return the IPA (e.g
guest PA) only if stage-1 page table are accessible.
>
>>
>>> A way to work around this would require mem_access restrictions to be
>>> complete removed, which cannot be done unless all other vCPUs of the
>>> domain are paused to avoid a race-condition. With altp2m I could also
>>> envision creating a temporary p2m for the vcpu at hand with the
>>> restriction removed, so that it doesn't affect other vcpus. However,
>>> without a use-case specifically requiring this to be implemented I
>>> would not deem it critical.
>>
>>
>> I suggested a use-case on the previous e-mail... You are affected today
>> because Linux is creating hypercall buffer on the stack and heap. So the
>> memory would always be accessed before. I could foresee guest using const
>> hypercall buffer.
>>
>>> For now a comment in the header describing
>>> this limitation would suffice from my perspective.
>>
>>
>> So you are going to defer everything until someone actually hit it? It might
>> be time for you to focus a bit more on other use case...
>>
>
> Yes, as long as this is not a critical issue that breaks mem_access
> and can be worked around I'll postpone spending time on it. If someone
> finds the time in the meanwhile to submit a patch fixing it I would be
> happy to review and test it.
I will be happy to keep the memaccess code in p2m.c until I see a strong
reason to move it in a separate file.
Your sincerely,
--
Julien Grall
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-13 12:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-09 19:59 [PATCH v2 1/2] arm/mem_access: adjust check_and_get_page to not rely on current Tamas K Lengyel
2016-12-09 19:59 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] p2m: split mem_access into separate files Tamas K Lengyel
2017-01-03 15:31 ` Tamas K Lengyel
2017-01-11 16:33 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2017-01-30 21:11 ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-12-12 7:42 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] arm/mem_access: adjust check_and_get_page to not rely on current Jan Beulich
2016-12-12 7:47 ` Tamas K Lengyel
2016-12-12 11:46 ` Julien Grall
2016-12-12 18:42 ` Tamas K Lengyel
2016-12-12 19:11 ` Julien Grall
2016-12-12 19:41 ` Tamas K Lengyel
2016-12-12 21:28 ` Julien Grall
2016-12-12 23:47 ` Tamas K Lengyel
2016-12-13 12:50 ` Julien Grall [this message]
2016-12-13 18:03 ` Tamas K Lengyel
2016-12-13 18:39 ` Tamas K Lengyel
2016-12-13 18:28 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-12-13 18:41 ` Julien Grall
2016-12-13 19:39 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-12-14 12:05 ` Julien Grall
2016-12-15 4:54 ` George Dunlap
2016-12-15 16:16 ` Julien Grall
2017-01-03 15:29 ` Tamas K Lengyel
2017-01-30 21:11 ` Stefano Stabellini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=61cf5b48-30ec-7c0d-798a-5750421c5334@arm.com \
--to=julien.grall@arm.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=tamas.lengyel@zentific.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.