From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2001 10:22:48 -0500 From: Chris Mason Subject: Re: [lvm-devel] Re: [linux-lvm] LVM 0.9 vgscan problem Message-ID: <620160000.978708168@tiny> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Reply-To: linux-lvm@sistina.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: linux-lvm@sistina.com On Friday, January 05, 2001 01:10:22 PM -0200 Rik van Riel wrote: > On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Heinz J. Mauelshagen wrote: > >> Rik, nobody was "sitting" on bugfixes. It just got fixed >> recently and still needed some testing before making it into >> 2.4.0. > > Ahh I see... > >> As I stated in my other email: Andrea Arcangeli's help to >> integrate 0.9 into 2.4.0 brought it in. TTBOMK there was no >> previous negotiation about 0.9 inclusion in 2.4.0 with us >> before :-( > > OUCH ... so LVM 0.9 got pushed into the kernel before you > had a chance to do some serious testing ? ;( > Yes and no. I asked Heinz what was needed to include 0.9 on the next suse release. He gave me a short list of the known huge bugs, I fixed them and sent the patches along to andrea. Andrea picked up my merging patch into his tree, but I wasn't clear enough about the bug fix patch and it was missed. And, I missed that it didn't get into the kernel until it was too late (sorry Heinz). -chris