From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F780C433EF for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2022 21:14:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S245300AbiCBVOp (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Mar 2022 16:14:45 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42236 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S245356AbiCBVNV (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Mar 2022 16:13:21 -0500 Received: from mail-pf1-x431.google.com (mail-pf1-x431.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::431]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 830C9DD94B for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2022 13:11:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pf1-x431.google.com with SMTP id s11so2968634pfu.13 for ; Wed, 02 Mar 2022 13:11:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=message-id:date:mime-version:from:to:subject:reply-to:in-reply-to :references; bh=50Nephl6fy1USBwU2EAcPAe5o7oNF9XmCVhDKcdgHU0=; b=k/Qt51uzJu4Gip8Ko+DPexOfWfq5bXJRzTWN60gXZW5CIgFMjzCBAs0vSLrk7hs1EO fvE4gRVm7ercvQLg0wxaeEtyZwXN8eoOiq950lJvJmMZ0VD8+zshBgd6n7zuO5+VHff0 sGmHrrqI3SqXovpOfwO3whrfC72gWFen8+s39eESdI5ajg3r4K8H1UDJS0UPlVZrN57W tTtjjVUWbw9TDrNDqWm9kTO1vh4atkRhOgQu4QfIzd04EQt6YDHjTrZ5iWit6zkKQAkj yPuXfaAjLVwZf+i7vpBvqObpfluls+h/1dmiWzPu0uMTJTLvDASILntTZ6qDAoJcrKHX 81xQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:from:to:subject :reply-to:in-reply-to:references; bh=50Nephl6fy1USBwU2EAcPAe5o7oNF9XmCVhDKcdgHU0=; b=Cr+RWrCYZmi5gfB2L6c8aFUJn/v4ppDVWbJirkctjLpXLGmCGclAAfbTHZObVVOZEc WhHz5jih2pJ2VrBOR8/De70rce4tfeIgBYedO3XbtaRQmqMB6U09VPLS3MzzSollJPgB vW1ZdQkstZ3qpyjqIWv2HQP3klk1khbh5dtCOQcZhDJ2LoZczyoasqUswu5OJlHgGF2F 8rhqzH1Sx96/NukWsU4Wv02b3CuYfxRfiKdUMTlgs9iLA4zUr9Pfe8ux3t701yywuBRV Boa0EzCC+zzefepRIeyX2rXmZSnlYcArbtIPQsGVgwhBvYWXilfbCmh6s5mzF9hNnGpu /YRA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5325/aXasMaaElekN6ml5vudvG6C42FNadRUOp6MGlpnUNSmsBKs KBCfGrMnAps6uaywf/sMLpHvpMkzlB4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxltXAtmGBNVNhtXf4IFftegx4umlqaRI/PMwunk9xIp2LQQ/EJb3iGb20JJzOl0hBf+W1q1A== X-Received: by 2002:a65:5842:0:b0:374:58b8:2563 with SMTP id s2-20020a655842000000b0037458b82563mr27523461pgr.52.1646255510709; Wed, 02 Mar 2022 13:11:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from [172.17.0.2] ([20.112.13.67]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q92-20020a17090a1b6500b001bc169e26aasm5375532pjq.2.2022.03.02.13.11.50 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 02 Mar 2022 13:11:50 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <621fdd96.1c69fb81.7b41f.fa6a@mx.google.com> Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2022 13:11:50 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3659729772137072795==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: bluez.test.bot@gmail.com To: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr Subject: RE: Bluetooth: Don't assign twice the same value Reply-To: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: References: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org --===============3659729772137072795== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit This is automated email and please do not reply to this email! Dear submitter, Thank you for submitting the patches to the linux bluetooth mailing list. This is a CI test results with your patch series: PW Link:https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/bluetooth/list/?series=619692 ---Test result--- Test Summary: CheckPatch PASS 0.72 seconds GitLint PASS 0.42 seconds SubjectPrefix PASS 0.26 seconds BuildKernel PASS 38.87 seconds BuildKernel32 PASS 34.65 seconds Incremental Build with patchesPASS 47.41 seconds TestRunner: Setup PASS 618.78 seconds TestRunner: l2cap-tester PASS 16.73 seconds TestRunner: bnep-tester PASS 7.50 seconds TestRunner: mgmt-tester PASS 128.99 seconds TestRunner: rfcomm-tester FAIL 9.62 seconds TestRunner: sco-tester PASS 9.64 seconds TestRunner: smp-tester PASS 9.54 seconds TestRunner: userchan-tester PASS 7.80 seconds Details ############################## Test: TestRunner: rfcomm-tester - FAIL - 9.62 seconds Run test-runner with rfcomm-tester Total: 10, Passed: 9 (90.0%), Failed: 1, Not Run: 0 Failed Test Cases Basic RFCOMM Socket Client - Write 32k Success Failed 0.224 seconds --- Regards, Linux Bluetooth --===============3659729772137072795==--