Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] dt-bindings: net: wireless: mt76: clarify backoff limit format

[Ryder Lee <Ryder.Lee@mediatek.com>]

On Wed, 2026-02-11 at 17:01 +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2026 at 4:41 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
> wrote:
> > 
> > On 11/02/2026 09:33, Ryder Lee wrote:
> > > > > > Why this cannot be a schema?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > Well, actually, it's already a schema. This is just an
> > > > > expanded
> > > > 
> > > > Where exactly?
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > How 1T1ss is used across different generations is what my example
> > > above
> > > was talking about.
> > 
> > Where exactly it is already a schema? Please point me line encoding
> > this.
> 
> I think what Krzysztof is asking is why can't you have different
> compatible
> strings for each generation (connac, connac2, connac3), and then have
> conditionals in this document to describe in proper DT schema, not
> text,
> the length requirements of each property for each generation.
> 
> 
> ChenYu
> 

Oh, so this is exactly my original question: how do I describe a PCIe
device in the platform binding when there is no compatible string for
it (a NIC card)?

Ryder