From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Bainbridge Subject: Re: Re: bad ip checksums Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 19:03:09 +0100 Message-ID: <623652d50510061103i23183540o@mail.gmail.com> References: Reply-To: Chris Bainbridge Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Ian Pratt Cc: xen-devel List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 06/10/05, Ian Pratt wrote: > > > > > On 06/10/05, Ian Pratt wrote: > > > > > My old 20050929 snapshot works ok. The .config files > > are identical. > > > > > Kernel config attached. Any ideas on what broke? > > > > > > > > Last nights binary release doesn't have this problem. Is > > the config > > > > file available? > > > > > > linux-2.6-sparse/arch/xen/configs > > > > Using that config, with 7234. I built a dom0 kernel and the > > problem is still present. Weird. What gcc and binutils are > > you using? I've got gcc 3.4.4 and binutils-2.15.92.0.2. > > The nightly build is done on an FC2 box: > > gcc 3.3.3 binutils 2.15.90.0.3 > > Please can you verify that this is indeed a compiler specific issue. Well, I've tried updating to binutils-2.15.91, then downgrading to gcc-3.3.5 and binutils 2.15.92.0.2, and nothing worked. It's a mystery. Your binary build works fine, but my kernels built from source are failing in an odd way. Is it possible to get a post-patched full xen kernel sources anywhere?