All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Steigerwald <ms@teamix.de>
To: fio@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Subject: hardening fio build with PIE for Address Space Layout Randomization and bindnow linking
Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 12:10:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6243211.bqPIL7RjHY@merkaba> (raw)

Hello Jens!

In my attempt to harden the fio build as recommended within Debian, I tried to 
build it with PIE by using Debian´s own mechanism via dpkg-buildflags. And I 
got:

    CC diskutil.o
    CC fifo.o
    CC blktrace.o
    CC cgroup.o
    CC trim.o
    CC engines/sg.o
    CC engines/binject.o
    CC oslib/linux-dev-lookup.o
    CC fio.o
  LINK fio
/usr/bin/ld: crc/crc16.o: relocation R_X86_64_32S against `crc16_table' can 
not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
crc/crc16.o: error adding symbols: Bad value
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
Makefile:399: recipe for target 'fio' failed
make[1]: *** [fio] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/ms/Debian/fio/pkg-fio'
dh_auto_build: make -j1 returned exit code 2
debian/rules:17: recipe for target 'build' failed
make: *** [build] Error 2
dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2


Yet, building fio 2.10 from upstream does doesn´t produce a shared object 
file.

Any idea?




I: fio: hardening-no-pie usr/bin/fio
N: 
N:    This package provides an ELF executable that was not compiled as a
N:    position independent executable (PIE).
N:    
N:    PIE is required for fully enabling Address Space Layout Randomization
N:    (ASLR), which makes "Return-oriented" attacks more difficult.
N:    
N:    Historically, PIE has been associated with noticeable performance
N:    overhead on i386. However, GCC-5 has implemented an optimization that
N:    can reduce the overhead significantly.
N:    
N:    If you use dpkg-buildflags, you may have to add hardening=+pie or
N:    hardening=+all to DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS.
N:    
N:    The relevant compiler flags must be passed both to the compiler and the
N:    linker (e.g. for C that would be commonly be CFLAGS and LDFLAGS).
N:    
N:    CAVEAT: Please keep in mind that the PIE flag (-fPIE) is not suitable
N:    for all cases:
N:    
N:     * It is <not> compatible with -fPIC which required for
N:       compiling shared libraries.
N:     * It is unlikely to work when compiling static libraries or
N:       executables (gcc -static).
N:    
N:    If your upstream build compiles either of the above, you may have to
N:    patch the build to ensure that only ELF executables are compiled with
N:    PIE.
N:    
N:    Refer to https://wiki.debian.org/Hardening,
N:    https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/changes.html, and
N:    https://software.intel.com/en-us/blogs/2014/12/26/new-optimizations-for-x86-in-upcoming-gcc-50-32bit-pic-mode
N:    for details.
N:    
N:    Severity: wishlist, Certainty: certain
N:    
N:    Check: binaries, Type: binary, udeb
N: 
I: fio: hardening-no-pie usr/bin/fio-btrace2fio
I: fio: hardening-no-pie usr/bin/fio-dedupe
I: fio: hardening-no-pie usr/bin/fio-genzipf


Another option to harden fio works find and that is:

I: fio: hardening-no-bindnow usr/bin/fio
N: 
N:    This package provides an ELF binary that lacks the "bindnow" linker
N:    flag.
N:    
N:    If the ELF binary does not rely on late binding of symbols (e.g. weak
N:    symbols), then please consider enabling this feature. Otherwise, please
N:    consider overriding the tag (possibly with a comment about why).
N:    
N:    If you use dpkg-buildflags, you may have to add hardening=+bindnow or
N:    hardening=+all to DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS.
N:    
N:    The relevant compiler flags are set in LDFLAGS.
N:    
N:    Refer to https://wiki.debian.org/Hardening for details.
N:    
N:    Severity: wishlist, Certainty: certain
N:    
N:    Check: binaries, Type: binary, udeb
N: 
I: fio: hardening-no-pie usr/bin/fio-btrace2fio
I: fio: hardening-no-bindnow usr/bin/fio-btrace2fio
I: fio: hardening-no-pie usr/bin/fio-dedupe
I: fio: hardening-no-bindnow usr/bin/fio-dedupe
I: fio: hardening-no-pie usr/bin/fio-genzipf
I: fio: hardening-no-bindnow usr/bin/fio-genzipf


Maybe it would be nice to have some of these in upstream build? PIE may not 
yet be advisable as for GCC 5 requirement.

Thanks,


             reply	other threads:[~2016-05-24 10:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-24 10:10 Martin Steigerwald [this message]
2016-05-24 14:17 ` hardening fio build with PIE for Address Space Layout Randomization and bindnow linking Jens Axboe
2016-05-25  8:47   ` Martin Steigerwald

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6243211.bqPIL7RjHY@merkaba \
    --to=ms@teamix.de \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=fio@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.