All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v13 7/8] libbpf: Add syscall common attributes support for map_create
Date: Wed, 13 May 2026 18:46:25 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <624b092f-e1fe-4a24-9bf6-c505e202b3ef@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260512235629.C5CABC2BCB0@smtp.kernel.org>

On 13/5/26 07:56, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
[...]
>>  
>> -	fd = sys_bpf_fd(BPF_MAP_CREATE, &attr, attr_sz);
>> +	log_opts = OPTS_GET(opts, log_opts, NULL);
>> +	if (log_opts && feat_supported(NULL, FEAT_BPF_SYSCALL_COMMON_ATTRS)) {
> 
> Should there be an OPTS_VALID() check for the nested log_opts structure
> before we start extracting its fields?
> 
> While the parent opts structure is correctly validated with OPTS_VALID()
> at the start of bpf_map_create(), log_opts is a newly introduced option
> structure with its own sz field for forward and backward compatibility.
> 
> If an application compiled against a future libbpf header passes a
> bpf_log_opts struct with new, non-zero fields, wouldn't this silently
> ignore those fields instead of returning -EINVAL?
> 

Good catch.

OPTS_VALID() is missed for log_opts here.

Will post a follow-up patch after the sashiko reviews for v14.

Thanks,
Leon

>> +		memset(&attr_common, 0, attr_common_sz);
>> +		attr_common.log_buf = ptr_to_u64(OPTS_GET(log_opts, buf, NULL));
>> +		attr_common.log_size = OPTS_GET(log_opts, size, 0);
>> +		attr_common.log_level = OPTS_GET(log_opts, level, 0);
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-13 10:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-11 15:28 [PATCH bpf-next v13 0/8] bpf: Extend BPF syscall with common attributes support Leon Hwang
2026-05-11 15:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next v13 1/8] " Leon Hwang
2026-05-11 16:19   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-11 16:53     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-05-12  2:41       ` Leon Hwang
2026-05-11 15:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next v13 2/8] libbpf: Add support for extended BPF syscall Leon Hwang
2026-05-11 15:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next v13 3/8] bpf: Refactor reporting log_true_size for prog_load Leon Hwang
2026-05-11 15:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next v13 4/8] bpf: Add syscall common attributes support " Leon Hwang
2026-05-12 22:18   ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-13 10:44     ` Leon Hwang
2026-05-11 15:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next v13 5/8] bpf: Add syscall common attributes support for btf_load Leon Hwang
2026-05-11 15:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next v13 6/8] bpf: Add syscall common attributes support for map_create Leon Hwang
2026-05-11 16:19   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-11 17:07     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-05-12  2:47       ` Leon Hwang
2026-05-12 23:36   ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-13 10:45     ` Leon Hwang
2026-05-13 17:02       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-05-14 13:59         ` Leon Hwang
2026-05-11 15:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next v13 7/8] libbpf: " Leon Hwang
2026-05-12 23:56   ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-13 10:46     ` Leon Hwang [this message]
2026-05-11 15:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next v13 8/8] selftests/bpf: Add tests to verify map create failure log Leon Hwang
2026-05-13  0:33   ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-13 10:47     ` Leon Hwang
2026-05-13 16:58       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-05-14 13:59         ` Leon Hwang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=624b092f-e1fe-4a24-9bf6-c505e202b3ef@linux.dev \
    --to=leon.hwang@linux.dev \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.