From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Am=C3=A9rico_Wang?= <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
torvalds@osdl.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Subject: Re: [2.6.33-rc5] Weird deadlock when shutting down
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 12:22:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6253.1269606122@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2375c9f91003251943r4663ae51r5791acc374b6ccc4@mail.gmail.com>
Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> wrote:
> > =======================================================
> > [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
> > 2.6.34-rc2-cachefs #115
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > halt/2291 is trying to acquire lock:
> > (s_active#31){++++.+}, at: [<ffffffff81104950>] sysfs_addrm_finish+0x31/0x5a
> >
> > but task is already holding lock:
> > (&per_cpu(cpu_policy_rwsem, cpu)){+++++.}, at: [<ffffffff812a3a92>] lock_policy_rwsem_write+0x4a/0x7b
> >
> > which lock already depends on the new lock.
> >
>
>
> I already send a patch for this:
>
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/83558/
>
> It is still in -mm tree, I think.
Tested-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-26 12:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-29 4:41 [2.6.33-rc5] Weird deadlock when shutting down Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-02-18 9:36 ` Johannes Berg
2010-02-18 16:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-02-18 18:45 ` Johannes Berg
2010-02-20 7:13 ` Américo Wang
2010-02-20 8:56 ` Johannes Berg
2010-02-20 9:06 ` Américo Wang
2010-02-20 10:53 ` Johannes Berg
2010-02-20 11:28 ` Johannes Berg
2010-02-20 12:07 ` Johannes Berg
2010-02-20 13:44 ` Américo Wang
2010-02-20 13:57 ` Johannes Berg
2010-02-21 9:51 ` Américo Wang
2010-02-21 10:17 ` Johannes Berg
2010-02-22 8:19 ` Américo Wang
2010-02-22 8:39 ` Johannes Berg
2010-02-21 10:43 ` Johannes Berg
2010-02-21 10:55 ` Xiaotian Feng
2010-02-21 11:12 ` Xiaotian Feng
2010-02-21 11:14 ` Johannes Berg
2010-02-21 11:22 ` Johannes Berg
2010-02-22 8:34 ` Américo Wang
2010-02-22 9:04 ` Johannes Berg
2010-02-22 9:12 ` Américo Wang
2010-02-22 9:14 ` Johannes Berg
2010-02-22 9:21 ` Américo Wang
2010-02-22 8:22 ` Américo Wang
2010-02-20 7:42 ` Dave Young
2010-02-20 8:46 ` Johannes Berg
2010-02-20 4:46 ` Américo Wang
2010-02-20 8:45 ` Johannes Berg
2010-02-20 9:30 ` Américo Wang
2010-02-20 10:52 ` Johannes Berg
2010-03-25 11:28 ` David Howells
2010-03-26 2:43 ` Américo Wang
2010-03-26 12:22 ` David Howells [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6253.1269606122@redhat.com \
--to=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.