From: Jeykumar Sankaran <jsanka@codeaurora.org>
To: dhar@codeaurora.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, robdclark@gmail.com,
seanpaul@chromium.org, hoegsberg@chromium.org,
abhinavk@codeaurora.org, chandanu@codeaurora.org,
nganji@codeaurora.org, jshekhar@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: drm/msm/dpu: Correct dpu encoder spinlock initialization
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 14:40:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <627144af54459a203f1583d2ad9b390c@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d61d7805b4ac0ec45309bf5b65841262@codeaurora.org>
On 2019-06-24 22:44, dhar@codeaurora.org wrote:
> On 2019-06-25 03:56, Jeykumar Sankaran wrote:
>> On 2019-06-23 23:27, Shubhashree Dhar wrote:
>>> dpu encoder spinlock should be initialized during dpu encoder
>>> init instead of dpu encoder setup which is part of commit.
>>> There are chances that vblank control uses the uninitialized
>>> spinlock if not initialized during encoder init.
>> Not much can be done if someone is performing a vblank operation
>> before encoder_setup is done.
>> Can you point to the path where this lock is acquired before
>> the encoder_setup?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Jeykumar S.
>>>
>
> When running some dp usecase, we are hitting this callstack.
>
> Process kworker/u16:8 (pid: 215, stack limit = 0x00000000df9dd930)
> Call trace:
> spin_dump+0x84/0x8c
> spin_dump+0x0/0x8c
> do_raw_spin_lock+0x80/0xb0
> _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x34/0x44
> dpu_encoder_toggle_vblank_for_crtc+0x8c/0xe8
> dpu_crtc_vblank+0x168/0x1a0
> dpu_kms_enable_vblank+0[ 11.648998] vblank_ctrl_worker+0x3c/0x60
> process_one_work+0x16c/0x2d8
> worker_thread+0x1d8/0x2b0
> kthread+0x124/0x134
>
> Looks like vblank is getting enabled earlier causing this issue and we
> are using the spinlock without initializing it.
>
> Thanks,
> Shubhashree
>
DP calls into set_encoder_mode during hotplug before even notifying the
u/s. Can you trace out the original caller of this stack?
Even though the patch is harmless, I am not entirely convinced to move
this
initialization. Any call which acquires the lock before encoder_setup
will be a no-op since there will not be any physical encoder to work
with.
Thanks and Regards,
Jeykumar S.
>>> Change-Id: I5a18b95fa47397c834a266b22abf33a517b03a4e
>>> Signed-off-by: Shubhashree Dhar <dhar@codeaurora.org>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c | 3 +--
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c
>>> index 5f085b5..22938c7 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c
>>> @@ -2195,8 +2195,6 @@ int dpu_encoder_setup(struct drm_device *dev,
>>> struct
>>> drm_encoder *enc,
>>> if (ret)
>>> goto fail;
>>>
>>> - spin_lock_init(&dpu_enc->enc_spinlock);
>>> -
>>> atomic_set(&dpu_enc->frame_done_timeout, 0);
>>> timer_setup(&dpu_enc->frame_done_timer,
>>> dpu_encoder_frame_done_timeout, 0);
>>> @@ -2250,6 +2248,7 @@ struct drm_encoder *dpu_encoder_init(struct
>>> drm_device *dev,
>>>
>>> drm_encoder_helper_add(&dpu_enc->base, &dpu_encoder_helper_funcs);
>>>
>>> + spin_lock_init(&dpu_enc->enc_spinlock);
>>> dpu_enc->enabled = false;
>>>
>>> return &dpu_enc->base;
--
Jeykumar S
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-25 21:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-24 6:27 drm/msm/dpu: Correct dpu encoder spinlock initialization Shubhashree Dhar
2019-06-24 22:26 ` Jeykumar Sankaran
2019-06-25 5:44 ` dhar
2019-06-25 21:40 ` Jeykumar Sankaran [this message]
2019-07-01 10:29 ` dhar
2019-07-02 18:21 ` Jeykumar Sankaran
2019-07-02 19:15 ` Jeykumar Sankaran
2019-07-02 19:15 ` Jeykumar Sankaran
2019-07-22 18:20 ` Sean Paul
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=627144af54459a203f1583d2ad9b390c@codeaurora.org \
--to=jsanka@codeaurora.org \
--cc=abhinavk@codeaurora.org \
--cc=chandanu@codeaurora.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dhar@codeaurora.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=hoegsberg@chromium.org \
--cc=jshekhar@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nganji@codeaurora.org \
--cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
--cc=seanpaul@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.